رابطه بین خطر ذاتی و خطر کنترل در محیط حرفه‌ای حسابرسی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار حسابداری، دانشگاه پیام نور

2 استادیار حسابداری، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه پیام نور

4 دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

کلیدواژه‌ها


حاجیها، زهره. (۱۳۸۹). بررسی رابطه بین خطر ذاتی و خطر کنترل در رویکرد حسابرسی مبتنی   بر ریسک، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حسابداری مالی، 2 (۶): ۹۵- 120.
- حساس یگانه، یحیی و وحیدی الیزیی، ابراهیم. (۱۳۸۳). برداشت حسابرسان ایرانی از ریسک ذاتی، فصلنامه مطالعات حسابداری، ۷: 22 - 44.
- کمیته تدوین استانداردهای حسابرسی، (1388). استانداردهای حسابرسی، سایر خدمات اطمینان بخشی و خدمات مرتبط، سازمان حسابرسی، چاپ یازدهم.
- کمیته تجدید نظر دستورالعمل حسابرسی. (1387). دستورالعمل حسابرسی، بخشهای تجدید نظر شده با نگرش به مدیریت خطر حسابرسی (چاپ ششم). تهران: سازمان حسابرسی.
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1981). Audit Sampling. SAS. No. 39.
-  American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1983). Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit. SAS No. 47.
- Bedard, J.C., and Graham, L.E. (2002). The effects of decision aid orientation on risk factor identification and audit test planning. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 21 (2) : 39–56.
- Blay, A., Kizirian, T., and Sneathen, D. (2008). Evidential effort and risk assessment in auditing. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 6 (1) : 39-59
- Bechara, M. and Kapoor, G. (2012). Maximizing the value of a risk-based audit plan, The CPA Journal, March
- Chang, She-I., Tsai, C.F., Shih, D.H., and Hwang, C.L, (2008). The development of audit detection risk assessment system: Using the fuzzy theory and audit risk model. Expert Systems with Applications, 35 (1): 1053-1067
- Chong, H.G., and Vinten, G. (1996).  Materiality and audit risk modeling: financial management perspective. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22 (9) : 35-61.
- Chen, H., Huang, S., and Shih, K.H. (2006). An empirical examination of the impact of risk factors on auditor's risk assessment. International Journal of Management, 79 (2) : 151-164.
- Dickinson Angus. (2010). Interfacing risk management and internal audit - conflicting or complementary? Keeping good companies. Journal of Chartered Secretaries Australia Ltd, 62 (7): 412-417.
- Daniel, S. S. (1988). Some empirical evidence about the assessment of audit risk in practice. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 7 (2) : 174-81.
- Hayes, R., Dassen, R., Schilder, A., and Wallage, P. (2005). A practical model to audit risk assessment in a health-care setting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 10 (5) : 37-41.
- Helliar, C., Lyon, B., Monroe, G.S., Ng, J., and Woodliff, D.R. (1996). UK auditors’ perceptions of inherent risk. British Accounting Review, 28 (1): 45–72.
- Hogan, C., and Wilkins, M.S. (2008). Evidence on the audit risk model: do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies?, Contemporary  Accounting Research, 25 (1): 219–242. 
- Khurana, I. K., and Raman, K. K. (2004). Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of big 4 versus non-big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79 (2): 473–495.
- Ruhnke K. and Schmidt M. (2014) Misstatements in financial statements: the relationship between inherent and control risk factors and audit adjustments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 33 (4): 247-269.
- Krishnan, J., and Krishnan, J. (1997). Litigation risk and auditor resignations. The Accounting Review, 72 (4): 539–560.
- Low, K.Y. (2004). The effects of industry specialization on audit risk assessments and audit-planning decisions. The Accounting Review, 79 (1): 201–219.
- International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2009). Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing, ISA No 200.
- Messier, J.W.F., and Austen, L.A. (2000). Inherent risk and control risk assessments: Evidence on the effect of pervasive and specific risk factors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19 (2):119–131.
- Monroe, G.S., Ng, J.K.L., and Woodliff, D.R. (1993). The importance of inherent risk factors; Auditors` perception, Australian Accounting Review, 3 (2): 148–159.
- Quadackers, L., Mock, T.J. and Maijoor, S. (1996). Audit risk and audit programmes: Archival data from four Dutch audit firms. The European Accounting Review, 5 (2): 217-237.
- Ritchie, B., and Khorwatt, E. (2007). The attitude of Libyan auditors to inherent control risk assessment. The British Accounting Review, 39 (1), 39-59.
- Shailer, G., Wade, M., Willett, R., & Yap, K. L. (1998). Inherent risk and indicative factors: senior auditors’ perceptions. Managerial Auditing Journal, 13 (8) : 455-464.
- Strawser, J.R. (1991). Examination of the effect of risk model components on perceived audit risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10 (1) : 126-35.
- Wright, W.F. and Leslie, B. (2011). “Fraudulent management explanations and the impact of alternative resentations of client cusiness evidence”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30  (2): 153-171.
- Yanmei, L.U.O. (2013). Internal audit research on role conflict between corporate governance and risk management. Journal of Audit & Economics, 3 (4): 52-75.