The Interactive Effect of Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) Reporting Performance on Cost of Debt

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Economics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2024.23865.4085

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this research is to investigate the interactive effect of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) reporting and disclosure on the cost of debt.
 
Method: In this research, a sample consisting of 910 company-years during the period of 2016-2022 was selected and tested from among the companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange and tested based on multiple regression of research models.
 
Results: The results showed that ESG disclosure leads to an increase in the cost of debt. Also, poor ESG performance is associated with lower cost of debt. In addition, the interaction between disclosure and ESG performance weakens the increase in the cost of debt. Also, environmental and social disclosure is associated with an increase in the cost of debt, and disclosure of corporate governance does not have a significant effect on the cost of debt. Among the dimensions of ESG performance, weak environmental performance and corporate governance lead to a decrease and an increase in the cost of debt, respectively.
 
Conclusion: These results show conflicting evidence with international studies for Iran and contribute to a deeper understanding of ESG reporting. Considering that the impact of ESG performance and its disclosure on the cost of debt has not been investigated in domestic research, the results of this research contribute to the enrichment of existing literature in the field of ESG.

Keywords

Main Subjects


اسکندری، علیرضا و دیندار دودران، سارا (1402). تأثیر افشای گزارش پایداری بر سرمایه نامشهود شرکت‌ها. چشم انداز حسابداری و مدیریت، 6(84)، 37-50. https://www.jamv.ir/article_183796.html?lang=fa
پورغلامی دافچاهی، غلامحسین؛ صمدی لرگانی، محمود؛ علی خانی، راضیه و پورعلی، محمدرضا. (1402). ارزیابی کیفیت افشای پایداری و تأثیر آن بر عملکرد پایداری مبتنی بر تئوری مشروعیت. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 12(46)، 275-296. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_21544.html
حاجیها، زهره و مقامی، فهیمه (۱۳۹5). تأثیر استراتژی متنوع سازی شرکتی بر هزینه بدهی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. دانش حسابرسی، 16(64)، 89-106. https://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-1346-fa.html
حساس یگانه یحیی، باباجانی جعفر، تقوی فرد محمد تقی و آرین‌پور، آرش (1397). تحلیل عملکرد پایدار زیست محیطی و تأثیر آن بر هزینه سرمایه شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، ۳(۵)، ۱-۳۹. https://aapc.khu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=485&slc_lang=fa&sid=1&printcase=1&hbnr=1&hmb=1
فخاری، حسین؛ ملکیان، اسفندیار و جفایی رهنی، منیر (1396). تبیین و رتبه بندی مولفه‌ها وشاخص‌های گزارشگری زیست‌محیطی، اجتماعی و راهبری شرکتی به روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار. حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، 2(4)، 153-187. https://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-340-fa.html
فرح‌آبادی، مسعود، حیدرپور، فرزانه و جهانشاد، آزیتا (1402). جهت‌گیری پایداری زیست محیطی و ساختار مالی؛ اثرات تعدیل کننده سطح فعالیت، نوع صنعت، سودآوری و سرمایه زیست محیطی. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 12(46)، 245-258. www.jmaak.ir/article_21542.html
فاطری، علی، حجازی، رضوان و مشایخی، بیتا (1402). ارائه الگوی گزارشگری پایداری برای شهرداری‌ها. مجله دانش حسابداری، 14(3)، 59-86. https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_3608.html
ملکیان، اسفندیار؛ فخاری، حسین و جفایی رهنی، منیر (1398). بررسی تأثیر ویژگی‌های هیئت‌مدیره شرکت بر میزان گزارشگری زیست ‌محیطی، اجتماعی و راهبری شرکتی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 10(2)، 77-112. https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2274.html
معبودی حمیدرضا، رضایی فرزین، کردستانی غلامرضا (1401). تأثیر گزارشگری پایداری بر ارتباط بین کیفیت حسابرسی و سایر ساز وکارهای راهبری شرکتی با تکنیک‌های حسابداری مدیریت. دانش حسابرسی، ۲۲(۸۸)، ۲۱۹-۲۵۴. danesh.dmk.ir/2684&sid=1&slc_lang=fa
مؤمنی، علیرضا؛ صالحی، علی‌اصغر و نورعلیزاده، نداسادات (1399). بیش ارزش‌گذاری سهام بر هزینه بدهی شرکت‌ها با در نظر گرفتن متغیر تعدیلگر عدم ‌تقارن ‌اطلاعاتی. حسابداری و منافع اجتماعی، 10(2)، 91-112. https://jaacsi.alzahra.ac.ir/article_4822.html

References

Alawadi, A., Kakabadse, N., Morley, M. & Khan, N. (2023). Diversified boards and the achievement of environmental, social, and governance goals. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(3), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12606
Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes Ii, K. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00032-1
Aman, H., & Nguyen, P. (2013). Does good governance matter to debtholders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 29, 14–34. 10.1016/j.ribaf.2013.02.002
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization science, 1(2), 177–194. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2635061
Cahan, S. F., De Villiers, C., Jeter, D. C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2016). Are CSR disclosures value relevant? Cross-country evidence. European Accounting Review, 25(3), 579–611. 10.1080/09638180.1064009
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
Crifo, P., Diaye, M. A., & Oueghlissi, R. (2017). The effect of countries’ ESG ratings on their sovereign borrowing costs. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 66, 13–20.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.04.011
Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
Dennis, S. A., & Mullineaux, D. J. (2000). Syndicated loans. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(4), 404–426. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.2000.0298
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102097
Erragragui, E. (2017). Do creditors price firms’ environmental, social and governance risks? Research in International Business and Finance, 45, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.151
Eskandari, A., & Dindar Dodran, S. (2023). The impact of disclosure of sustainability reports on the intangible capital of companies. Journal of Accounting and Management Vision, 6(84), 37-50. www.jamv.ir/183796 [In Persian].
Fakhari, H., Malekian, E., & Jafaei Rahni, M. (2018). Explaining and Ranking of the components and indicators of environmental, social and corporate governance reporting by analytic hierarchy process in the companies listed in Stock Exchange. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2(4), 153-187. aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-340-fa.html [In Persian].
Farahabady, M., Heidarpoor, F., & Jahanshad, A. (2023). Orientation of environmental sustainability and financial structure; Moderating effects of activity level, type of industry, profitability and environmental capital. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 12(46), 245-258. www.jmaak.ir/21542 [In Persian].
Fateri, A., Hejazi, R., & Mashayekhi, B. (2023). Presenting a Sustainability reporting model for municipalities. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 14(3), 59-86. https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_3608.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Ge, W., & Liu, M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and the cost of corporate bonds. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(6), 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.05.008
Golden, J., Kohlbeck, M., & Rezaee, Z. (2020). Is cost stickiness associated with sustainability factors? Advances in Management Accounting, 32, 35-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120200000032002
Hajiha, Z., & Maghami, F. (2016). The effect of corporate diversification strategy on the cost of debt in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Audit Science, 16(64), 119-134. https://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-1346-fa.html [In Persian].
Hasan, I., Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2017). Social capital and debt contracting: Evidence from bank loans and public bonds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(3), 1017–1047. www.jstor.org/26164629
Hassas Yeganeا Y., Babajani J., Taghi Taghavifard M., & Arianpoor A. (2018). Analysis of environmental sustainability performance and its impact on the cost of equity in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting, 3(5), 1-39. aapc.khu.ac.ir/1&hbnr=1&hmb=1 [In Persian].
Hoepner, A., Oikonomou, I., Scholtens, B., & Schröder, M. (2016). The effects of corporate and country sustainability characteristics on the cost of debt: An international investigation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43(1–2), 158–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12183
Hughes, S. B., Anderson, A., & Golden, S. (2001). Corporate environmental disclosures: Are they useful in determining environmental performance? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20(3), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00031-X
Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6
Kim, E. H., & Lyon, T. P. (2014). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26(3), 705–723. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43661016
Maboudi, H., Rezaei, F., Karami, & Gh. (2022). The effect of sustainability reporting on the relationship between audit quality and other corporate governance mechanisms with management accounting techniques. Audit Knowledge, 22(88), 219-254. https://danesh.dmk.ir/browse.php?a_id=2684&sid=1&slc_lang=fa [In Persian].
Magnanelli, B. S., & Izzo, M. F. (2017). Corporate social performance and cost of debt: The relationship. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(2), 250-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2016-0103
Malekian, E., Fakhari, H., & Jafaei Rahni, M. (2019). Impact of board of directors' characteristics on environmental, social, and corporate governance reporting. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 10(2), 77-112. https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2274.html [In Persian].
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
Momeni, A., Salehi, A., & Nooralizadeh asl, N. S. (2020). Relationship between stock over-valuation and corporate debt costs with considering the moderator variable of information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Social Interests, 10(2), 91-112. https://jaacsi.alzahra.ac.ir/article_4822.html [In Persian].
Nazari, J. A., Hrazdil, K., & Mahmoudian, F. (2017). Assessing social and environmental performance through narrative complexity in CSR reports. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.05.002.
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
Patten, D. M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00028-4
Pourgholami Dafchahi, G., Samadi Largani, M., Alikhani, R., & Pourali, M.R. (2023). Evaluating the quality of sustainability disclosure and its impact on sustainability performance based on the theory of legitimacy. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 12(46), 275-296. journals.srbiau.ac.ir/21544 [In Persian].
Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(2), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767
Stellner, C., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and Eurozone corporate bonds: The moderating role of country sustainability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 538–549. 10.1016/j.jbankfin.032
Thompson, P., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). Bringing the environment into bank lending: Implications for environmental reporting. The British Accounting Review, 36(2), 197–218. 10.1016/j.bar.2003.11.005
UNEP (2012). UNEP Statement of Commitment by Financial Institutions on Sustainable Development. Available: www.unepfi.org.about.unep-fistatement [Accessed 01.03.2018].
Weber, O., Scholz, R. W., & Michalik, G. (2010). Incorporating sustainability criteria into credit risk management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.636
Zeidan, R., Boechat, C., & Fleury, A. (2015). Developing a sustainability credit score system. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2034-2