Relationship between Inherent Risk and Control Risk in Iran’s Auditing Professional

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Auditing standards have required assessment of risk in each auditing project by audit risk model. The aim of this study is to examine auditors’ assessment methods for inherent risk and control risk in the Iranian environment of professional auditing. After literature review of the specialized auditing sources and collecting experts’ ideas, 44 factors attributed to inherent and control risks, and then, a questionnaire designed and distributed among employed certified public accountants.
The results reaveled that there is a significant relationship between control risk and inherent risk, and that integrated assessment of risks is preferred to separate assessments of each of control risk and inherent risk

Keywords


حاجیها، زهره. (۱۳۸۹). بررسی رابطه بین خطر ذاتی و خطر کنترل در رویکرد حسابرسی مبتنی   بر ریسک، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حسابداری مالی، 2 (۶): ۹۵- 120.
- حساس یگانه، یحیی و وحیدی الیزیی، ابراهیم. (۱۳۸۳). برداشت حسابرسان ایرانی از ریسک ذاتی، فصلنامه مطالعات حسابداری، ۷: 22 - 44.
- کمیته تدوین استانداردهای حسابرسی، (1388). استانداردهای حسابرسی، سایر خدمات اطمینان بخشی و خدمات مرتبط، سازمان حسابرسی، چاپ یازدهم.
- کمیته تجدید نظر دستورالعمل حسابرسی. (1387). دستورالعمل حسابرسی، بخشهای تجدید نظر شده با نگرش به مدیریت خطر حسابرسی (چاپ ششم). تهران: سازمان حسابرسی.
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1981). Audit Sampling. SAS. No. 39.
-  American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1983). Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit. SAS No. 47.
- Bedard, J.C., and Graham, L.E. (2002). The effects of decision aid orientation on risk factor identification and audit test planning. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 21 (2) : 39–56.
- Blay, A., Kizirian, T., and Sneathen, D. (2008). Evidential effort and risk assessment in auditing. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 6 (1) : 39-59
- Bechara, M. and Kapoor, G. (2012). Maximizing the value of a risk-based audit plan, The CPA Journal, March
- Chang, She-I., Tsai, C.F., Shih, D.H., and Hwang, C.L, (2008). The development of audit detection risk assessment system: Using the fuzzy theory and audit risk model. Expert Systems with Applications, 35 (1): 1053-1067
- Chong, H.G., and Vinten, G. (1996).  Materiality and audit risk modeling: financial management perspective. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22 (9) : 35-61.
- Chen, H., Huang, S., and Shih, K.H. (2006). An empirical examination of the impact of risk factors on auditor's risk assessment. International Journal of Management, 79 (2) : 151-164.
- Dickinson Angus. (2010). Interfacing risk management and internal audit - conflicting or complementary? Keeping good companies. Journal of Chartered Secretaries Australia Ltd, 62 (7): 412-417.
- Daniel, S. S. (1988). Some empirical evidence about the assessment of audit risk in practice. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 7 (2) : 174-81.
- Hayes, R., Dassen, R., Schilder, A., and Wallage, P. (2005). A practical model to audit risk assessment in a health-care setting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 10 (5) : 37-41.
- Helliar, C., Lyon, B., Monroe, G.S., Ng, J., and Woodliff, D.R. (1996). UK auditors’ perceptions of inherent risk. British Accounting Review, 28 (1): 45–72.
- Hogan, C., and Wilkins, M.S. (2008). Evidence on the audit risk model: do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies?, Contemporary  Accounting Research, 25 (1): 219–242. 
- Khurana, I. K., and Raman, K. K. (2004). Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of big 4 versus non-big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79 (2): 473–495.
- Ruhnke K. and Schmidt M. (2014) Misstatements in financial statements: the relationship between inherent and control risk factors and audit adjustments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 33 (4): 247-269.
- Krishnan, J., and Krishnan, J. (1997). Litigation risk and auditor resignations. The Accounting Review, 72 (4): 539–560.
- Low, K.Y. (2004). The effects of industry specialization on audit risk assessments and audit-planning decisions. The Accounting Review, 79 (1): 201–219.
- International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2009). Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing, ISA No 200.
- Messier, J.W.F., and Austen, L.A. (2000). Inherent risk and control risk assessments: Evidence on the effect of pervasive and specific risk factors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19 (2):119–131.
- Monroe, G.S., Ng, J.K.L., and Woodliff, D.R. (1993). The importance of inherent risk factors; Auditors` perception, Australian Accounting Review, 3 (2): 148–159.
- Quadackers, L., Mock, T.J. and Maijoor, S. (1996). Audit risk and audit programmes: Archival data from four Dutch audit firms. The European Accounting Review, 5 (2): 217-237.
- Ritchie, B., and Khorwatt, E. (2007). The attitude of Libyan auditors to inherent control risk assessment. The British Accounting Review, 39 (1), 39-59.
- Shailer, G., Wade, M., Willett, R., & Yap, K. L. (1998). Inherent risk and indicative factors: senior auditors’ perceptions. Managerial Auditing Journal, 13 (8) : 455-464.
- Strawser, J.R. (1991). Examination of the effect of risk model components on perceived audit risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10 (1) : 126-35.
- Wright, W.F. and Leslie, B. (2011). “Fraudulent management explanations and the impact of alternative resentations of client cusiness evidence”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30  (2): 153-171.
- Yanmei, L.U.O. (2013). Internal audit research on role conflict between corporate governance and risk management. Journal of Audit & Economics, 3 (4): 52-75.