The Impact of Managers’ Relative Performance on Future Corporate Risk-Taking: The Moderating Role of CEO Power

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Financial Sciences, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2026.25906.4225

Abstract

Objective: The present study investigates the impact of CEOs’ relative performance evaluation on corporate risk-taking, with a particular focus on the moderating role of CEO power, in the context of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange.
 
Method: This study is applied in terms of objective, and given the retrospective nature of the data, it can be classified as post-event research. From the perspective of nature and methodology, it is descriptive–correlational. To test the research hypotheses, the required data were extracted from the audited financial statements of firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange over the period 2012–2024 using Rahavard Novin software and the Codal database. A multiple linear regression model was employed for the statistical analysis.
 
Results: The results of the first hypothesis test indicate a significant relationship between relative performance evaluation and corporate risk-taking. The results of the second hypothesis test reveal that CEO power weakens the relationship between relative performance evaluation and risk-taking.
 
Conclusion: The analysis indicates that the evaluation of CEO performance during the first half of their tenure significantly influences their behavior in the second half. Companies whose CEOs perform poorly compared to their peers in interim evaluations tend to increase their level of risk-taking in subsequent evaluation periods. Conversely, CEOs with longer tenure, higher levels of education, and concurrent membership on the board of directors are more inclined to adopt lower-risk strategies. This suggests that managerial power can moderate the impact of relative performance evaluation on corporate risk-taking. In other words, while relative performance evaluation may encourage risk-taking and motivate managers to pursue high-risk strategies, managerial characteristics play a critical role in shaping organizational decision-making.

Keywords

Main Subjects


آژنگ، احمد؛ اسدی، غلامحسین؛ باغومیان، رافیک و حاجی‌پور، بهمن (1402). ارائه چارچوب مفهومی ارزیابی عملکرد در شرکت‌ها. مجله دانش حسابداری، 14(1)، 143-169.https://civilica.com/doc/1676726
خواجوی، شکرالله؛ ویسی حصار، ثریا و غیوری مقدم، علی (1403). تأثیر قدرت مدیرعامل بر خوانایی گزارش‌های مالی با تأکید بر نقش مدیریت سود و سرمایه‌گذاران نهادی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 15(4)، 20-1. DOI: 10.22103/jak.2024.22274.3953
رازمنش، فاطمه و نبی‌زاده، عارف (1400). اثر رقابت در بازار بر رابطه بین قدرت مدیرعامل و ریسک شرکت‌. چشم انداز حسابداری و مدیریت، 4(52)، 61-75.https://www.jamv.ir/article_143527_235b95d05095e9e4f29f0315f0a7a7f3.pdf
رسولی، حبیب اله؛ رمضان احمدی، محمد؛ نصیری، سعید و بصیرت، محمد (1401). تأثیر قدرت مدیرعامل بر کیفیت گزارشگری متقلبانه. مجله دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 12(45)، 317-334. https://doi.org/https://www.jmaak.ir/article_21475.html
عباسیان، شهرام؛ صفتی، فرید و غیاثوند، علیرضا (1395). بررسی تأثیر دوره تصدی مدیرعامل و ویژگی‌های هیئت مدیره بر مدیریت سود در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. کنفرانس بین المللی ایدههای نوین در مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری، اسپانیا. sid.ir/paper/858534/fa
کرمی، غلامرضا و اصغری، علی (1402). بررسی تأثیر ویژگی‌های مدیریت و استراتژی‌های مالی بر ریسک‌پذیری شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده دربازار بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. تحقیقات مالی، 25(4)، 529-556. https://doi.org/10.22059/frj.2023.354652.1007439
معتمدی، پگاه؛ تاری وردی، یداله و حیدرپور، فرزانه (1401). تأثیر قدرت مدیرعامل بر مدیریت سود مبتنی بر اقلام تعهدی و مدیریت سود واقعی. پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری، 12(4)، 147-172.https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2021.34811.2817
میرنوراللهی، سیده زهرا؛ براری نوکاشتی، صغری و آزادی هیر، کیهان (1403). رتبه اعتباری شرکت‌ها با تمرکز بر عوامل مدیریتی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 15(2)، 124-103. https://doi.org/10.22103/jak.2024.22564.3992
یوسفی اصل، فرزانه؛ صداقت پرست، الدار و باریکانی، مهسا (1398). بررسی رابطه بین قدرت مدیرعامل، ریسک‌پذیری شرکت و نقش تمرکز مالکیت. پژوهش‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی عملیاتی و عملکرد، 3(2)، 83-104.https://jopa.khatam.ac.ir/article_154198.html?lang=fa

References

Abbassian, S., Safti, F., & Ghiyasvand, A. (2016). Examining the effect of CEO tenure and board characteristics on earnings management in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Innovative Ideas in Management, Economics, and Accounting, Spain. https://sid.ir/paper/858534/fa [In Persian].
Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. The review of financial studies, 18(4), 1403-1432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi030
Andersson, J., & Mårdh, O. (2023). CEO Power in Perspective. LUND university. lup.lub.lu.se
Atayah, O. F., Najaf, K., Subramaniam, R. K., & Chin, P. N. (2022). The ascension of executives' tenure, corporate risk-taking and corporate performance: evidence from Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(1), 101-123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2021-0189
Azhang, A., Asadi, G., Baghomian, R., & Hajipour, B. (2023). Providing a conceptual framework for performance evaluation in companies. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 14(1), 143–169. https://civilica.com/doc/1676726 [In Persian].
Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly journal of economics, 118(4), 1169-1208. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25053937
Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J., Lundborg, P., & Majlesi, K. (2017). On the origins of risk‐taking in financial markets. The journal of finance, 72(5), 2229-2278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12521
Breit, E., Song, J., Sun, L., & Zhang, J. (2019). CEO power and employee productivity. Accounting Research Journal, 32(2), 148-165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-05-2016-0056
Do, T., Zhang, H., & Zuo, L. (2022). Rocking the boat: How relative performance evaluation affects corporate risk taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 73(1), 101425. doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101425
Eriksson, T. (1999). Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical tests on Danish data. Journal of labor Economics, 17(2), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1086/209920
Fakhrunnas, F., & Nahda, K. (2023). The impact of management performance on risk-taking behavior in a dual banking system: A cross-country analysis. Banks and Bank Systems, 18(4), 116. 10.21511/bbs.18(4).2023.11
Figner, B., & Weber, E. U. (2011). Who takes risks when and why? Determinants of risk taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415790
Florackis, C., & Ozkan, A. (2009). The impact of managerial entrenchment on agency costs: An empirical investigation using UK panel data. European Financial Management, 15(3), 497-528. 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00418.x
Gitman, L. J., Juchau, R., & Flanagan, J. (2015). Principles of managerial finance. Pearson Higher Education AU, Australia. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/P200000003322/9781488616530
Grund, C., Höcker, J., & Zimmermann, S. (2013). Incidence and consequences of risk‐taking behavior in tournaments—evidence from the NBA. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1489-1501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00499.x
Haider, J., & Fang, H.-X. (2018). CEO power, corporate risk taking and role of large shareholders. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 10(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-04-2017-0033
Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Ratri, M. C., & Nowland, J. (2019). CEO busyness and firm performance: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 5(5), e01601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01601
Kaplan, S. N., Klebanov, M. M., & Sorensen, M. (2012). Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? The journal of finance, 67(3), 973-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01739.x
Karami, G., & Asghari, A. (2024). Analyzing the Influence of Managerial Traits and Financial Strategies on Corporate Risk-taking in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Research Journal, 25(4), 529-556. https://doi.org/10.22059/frj.2023.354652.1007439 [In Persian].
Khajavi, Sh., Weysihesar, S., & Ghayouri Moghaddam, A. (2024). The effect of the CEO's power on the readability of financial reports with an emphasis on the role of earnings management and institutional investors. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 15(4), 1-20. DOI: 10.22103/jak.2024.22274.3953 [In Persian].
Koirala, S., Marshall, A., Neupane, S., & Thapa, C. (2020). Corporate governance reform and risk-taking: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in an emerging market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, 101396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.007.
Landier, A., Sauvagnat, J., Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2013). Bottom-up corporate governance. Review of Finance, 17(1), 161-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs020.
Mirnourollahi, S.Z., Barari Nokashti, S., & Azadi Hir, K. (2024). The credit rating of companies considering management factors. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 15(2), 103-124. 10.22103/jak.2024.22564.3992 [In Persian].
Motamedi,, ,. P. , Tariverdi, Y. and Heidarpoor, F. (2023). The Effect of CEO Power on Accrual Based Earnings Management and Real Earnings Management. Empirical Research in Accounting, 12(4), 147-172. DOI: 10.22051/jera.2021.34811.2817 [In Persian].
Na, K. (2020). CEOs’ outside opportunities and relative performance evaluation: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 137(3), 679-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.03.007
Nguyen, T. T. C., & Van Nguyen, C. (2024). Does the education level of the CEO and CFO affect the profitability of real estate and construction companies? Evidence from Vietnam. Heliyon, 10(7), 28376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28376
Peltomäki, J., Sihvonen, J., Swidler, S., & Vähämaa, S. (2021). Age, gender, and risk‐taking: Evidence from the S&P 1500 executives and market‐based measures of firm risk. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 48(9-10), 1988-2014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12528
Rasoli, H., Ramazan Ahmadi, M., Nasiri, S., & Basirat, M. (2023). The effect of CEO power on fraudulent financial reporting quality. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 12(45), 317-334. https://www.jmaak.ir/article_21475.html [In Persian].
Razmanesh, f., & nabizadeh, s. a. (2022). The impact of market competition in the relationship between CEO power and company risk. Journal of Accounting and Management Vision, 4(52), 61-75. https://www.jamv.ir/article_143527_235b95d05095e9e4f29f0315f0a7a7f3.pdf [In Persian].
Sedaghat parast, e., & Barikani, M. (2020). Investigating the relationship between CEO power, firm risk-taking and the role of ownership concentration. Operational and Performance Research in Accounting and Auditing, 3(2), 83-104. https://jopa.khatam.ac.ir/article_154198 [In Persian].
Stetsyuk, I., Altintig, A., Arin, K. P., & Kim, M. S. (2024). CEO Characteristics and Risk-Taking under Economic Policy Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(6), 238. https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/6/238.
Tice, F. M. (2024). The role of common risk in the effectiveness of explicit relative performance evaluation. Management Science, 70(3), 1635-1655. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4764
Timmermans, O. (2022). What are the Risk-Taking Properties of Long-Term Incentive Plans Based on Relative Performance? Working Paper,available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3570875
von Meyerinck, F., Romer, J., & Schmid, M. (2025). CEO turnover and director reputation. Journal of Financial Economics, 163, 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103971
Wen, F., Li, C., Sha, H., & Shao, L. (2021). How does economic policy uncertainty affect corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 41, 101840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101840
Wu, X. (2022). Relative performance evaluation in executive compensation contracts. Queensland University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.230764
Yim, S. (2013). The acquisitiveness of youth: CEO age and acquisition behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 250-273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.11.003
Zaiane, S. (2025). The nonlinear relationship between CEO stock options and strategic risk taking: the moderating role of CEO characteristics. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 25(4), 903-919. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2024-0050
Zinn, J. O. (2015). Towards a better understanding of risk-taking: Key concepts, dimensions and perspectives. Health, Risk & Society, 17(2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2015.1023267

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 25 May 2026
  • Receive Date: 11 September 2025
  • Revise Date: 17 January 2026
  • Accept Date: 15 February 2026