The Effect of Relative Performance Evaluation on Firm Risk-Taking: The Role of Managers' Competitive Motivations in the Tournament Theory Framework

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Accounting, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2026.26089.4236

Abstract

Objective: The relative performance evaluation of firms within an industry creates a tournament-like competitive structure that influences CEOs’ decisions regarding risk-taking. Firms that have achieved poor performance have a strong motivation to compensate and win in the next period. Accordingly, the objective of this research is to examine the effect of relative performance evaluation on firm risk-taking, considering the role of external and internal managerial competition incentives and proximity to the end of the performance evaluation period from the perspective of winning the tournament.
 
Method: The statistical sample includes 127 firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, covering the period from 2014 to 2022. To test the hypotheses, a multiple regression model within the framework of panel data was utilized.
 
Results: The research results indicated that firms that performed worse than their industry peers in the previous period exhibit higher risk-taking in the current period. Furthermore, the results showed that in firms where external and internal managerial competition incentives are high, the effect of poor performance in the previous period on current-period risk-taking is amplified. In addition, the findings revealed that as the end of the evaluation period approaches, the effect of poor performance in the previous period on current-period risk-taking becomes less pronounced in firms where external and internal managerial competition incentives are high.
 
Conclusion: Firms that have performed relatively worse than their competitors during an intermediate period demonstrate higher risk-taking in the remainder of the evaluation period, and this effect is strengthened when the importance of achieving success in the competition is greater for the CEO.

Keywords

Main Subjects


امری اسرمی، محمد؛ جلالی، فاطمه و کاظمی حاجی، فهیمه (1402). اثر قدرت و دانش مالی مدیرعامل بر رابطه بین ریسک سازمانی و عملکرد شرکت. قضاوت و تصمیم گیری در حسابداری، 7(2)، 86-67 .10.30495/jdaa.2023.705527
خواجوی، شکرالله؛ فتاحی نافچی، حسن و قدیریان آرانی، محمد حسین (1394). رتبه‌بندی و ارزیابی عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های صنایع منتخب بورس اوراق بهادار تهران با استفاده از مدل ترکیبی فازی-AHP -ویکور؛ مطالعه موردی: شرکت‌های صنایع دارویی، فلزات اساسی و خودرو و قطعات. نشریه دانش حسابرسی، 15(60)، 46-25. http://danesh.dmk.ir/article1099-1fa.html
خواجه حسینی، شایان و حق‌شناس کاشانی، فریده (1403). بررسی تأثیر سطح تکنالوژی از طریق متغیّرهای میانجیِ نوآوری، ریسک‌پذیری و عمل‌کرد حرفه‌یی بر عمل‌کرد سازمان: (مورد مطالعه: مرکز رُشد زیست‌فن‌آوری پژوهش‌گاه ملّی مهندسی ژنتیک و زیست‌فن‌آوری در تهران – ایران). فصلنامۀ علمی پژوهشی غالب، 13(1)، 24-1. 10.58342/ghal ibqj.V.13.I.1.1
داداشی، نسرین و پورعلی، محمدرضا (1402). تاثیر ریسک بر عملکرد با توجه به محدودیت مالی شرکت ها.  دانش حسابداری و حسابررسی مدیریت، 11(41)، 145- 158. https://sid.ir/paper/1049415/en
رضائی پیته نوئی، یاسر و غلامرضاپور، محمد (1401). قدرت مدیرعامل و بهره‌وری نیروی کار شرکت: آزمون تجربی نظریه تورنمنت. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 29(1)، 112-96. 10.22059/acctgrev.2021.313035.1008461
فتحه، محمدحسین و کارگر، حامد (1403). تأثیر مدیریت ریسک کسب و کار در ارتقای عملکرد پایداری شرکتی با تأکید بر نقش توانایی مدیریت. مجله دانش حسابداری، 15(3)، 132-111. 10.22103/jak.2023.22210.3949
فیروزبخت، مهدی و هوشیاره، حسین (1404). رابطه رگرسیونی ریسک نوسان عملکرد و سودآوری. نشریه علمی رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین مدیریت و حسابداری، 9(32)، 477-1461. https://majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view
محمدی سه دران، سارا و فغانی، مهدی (1402). بررسی رابطه بین سازوکارهای حاکمیت شرکتی و پاداش مدیران. مجله دانش حسابداری، 14(3)، 101-87. 10.22103/jak.2022.18100.3555
نظری‌پور، محمد و زکی‌زاده، بابک (1403). تحلیل اثرات رفتاری سیستم‌های ارتقاء شغلی مبتنی بر تئوری تورنمنت در حرفه حسابرسی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 15(4)، 100-75. 10.22103/jak.2023.21947.3925

References

Ali, S., Jiang, J., Rehman, R., & Khan M. K. (2023). Tournament incentives and environmental performance: The role of green innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 17670–17680. doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23406-w
Amri-Asrami, M., Jalali, F., & KazemiHaji, F. (2023). The effect of CEO's power and financial knowledge on the relation between enterprise risk and the firm’s performance. Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting, 7(2), 67-86. 10.30495/jdaa.2023.705527 [In Persian].
Bromiley, P., Miller, K. D., & Rau, D. (2015). Risk in strategic management research. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, 259-288. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4032672
Chhaochharia, V., Grullon, G., Grinstein, Y., & Michaely, R. (2012). Product market competition and agency conflicts: Evidence from the sarbanes Oxley law. Working Paper, University of Miami, Rice University, and Cornell University. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1109225
Dadashi, N., & Pourali, M. R. (2022). The effect of social responsibility and risk-taking on the performance of companies according to the moderator variable of financial constraint. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 11(41), 145-158. https://sid.ir/paper/1049415/en [In Persian].
Demerjian, P., Lev, B., & MacVay, S. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity test. Management Science, 58(7), 1229-1248. 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1487
Demirgüneş, K. (2015). Determinants of target dividend payout ratio: A panel autoregressive distributed lag analysis. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 418-426. 10.2308/accr-50318
Do, T., Zhang, H., & Zuo, L. (2022). Rocking the boat: How relative performance evaluation affects corporate risk taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1-20. 10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101425
Fatheh, M.H., & Kargar, H. (2024). The effect of business risk management in improving corporate sustainability performance with an emphasis on the role of management ability. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 15(3), 111-132. 10.22103/jak.2023.22210.3949 [In Persian].
Firoozbakht, M., & Hoshyareh, H. (2025). The regression relationship between performance volatility risk and profitability. Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 9(32), 1461–1477. https://majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view [In Persian].
Feriozzi, F., (2011). Paying for observable luck. RAND Journal of Economics, 42(2), 387-415. j.1756-2171.2011.00138.x
Gong, G., Li, L.Y., & Yin, H. (2019). Relative performance evaluation and the timing of earnings release. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2e3), 358-386. 10.1111/1911-3846.12731
Grund, C., Hocker, J., & Zimmermann, S. (2013). Incidence and consequences of risk-taking behavior in tournamentsdevidence from the NBA. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1489-1501. abs/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00499
Haβ, L. H., Müller, M. A., & Vergauwe, S. (2015). Tournament incentives and corporate fraud. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 251–267. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/corfin/v34y2015icp251-267.html
Henderson, A. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management team coordination needs the CEO pay gap: A competitive test of economic and behavioral views. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 96–117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3069339
Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. Journal of Risk & Insurance, 78(4), 795–822. 35392595ec98d33940ca4f37b6b53631/1
Huang, Sh., & Sun, L. (2014). Real earnings management,future firm performance and managerial ability, the dissertation for the degree of doctor of accounting. Miller College of Business Ball State University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273504063
Kale, J.R., Reis, E., & Venkateswaran, A. (2009). Rank‐order tournaments and incentive alignment: The effect on firm performance. Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1479–1512. abs/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01470
Khajavi, S., Fattahi Nafchi, H., & Gadirian Arani, M. H. (2015). Ranking and financial performance evaluation of selected industry companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange using the combined fuzzy AHP–VIKOR model: A case study of pharmaceutical, basic metals, and automotive & parts industries. Audit Knowledge Journal, 15(60), 25–46. http://danesh.dmk.ir/article1099-1fa.html [In Persian].
Khwaja Hosaeini, Sh., & Haghshenas Kashani, F. (1403). Investigating the effect of technology level through the mediating variables of innovation, risk-taking and professional performance on organizational performance: (Case study: Biotechnology development center of the national research institute of genetic engineering and biotechnology in Tehran - Iran). Ghalib Scientific Research Quarterly, 13(1), 1-24. 10.58342/ghal ibqj.V.13.I.1.1 [In Persian].
Mohammadi Sedaran, S., & Faghani, M. (2023). The Relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and compensation of managers. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 14(3), 87-101. 10.22103/jak.2022.3555 [In Persian].
Monzur Hasan, M., Adrian, Ch., & Grantley ,T. (2020). Financial statement comparability and bank risk-taking. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 16, 100206. org/a/eee/v16y2020i3s1815566920300230
Musallam, S.R.M. (2020). Effects of board characteristics, audit committee and risk management on corporate performance: evidence from Palestinian listed companies. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(4), 691-706. org/a/eme/imefmp/imefm-12-2017-0347
Nazaripour, M., & Zakizadeh, B. (2024). Analysis of behavioral effects in promotional systems based on tournament theory in auditing profession. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 15(4), 75-100. 10.22103/jak.2023.21947.3925 [In Persian].
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
Park, H., & Vrettos, D. (2015). The moderating effect of relative performance evaluation on the risk incentive properties of executives' equity portfolios. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(5), 1055-1108. abs/10.1111/1475-679X.12092
Pratono, A.H. (2018). Does firm performance increase with risk-taking behavior under information technological turbulence? The Journal of Risk Finance, 19(4), 361-378. org/a/eme/jrfpps/jrf-10-2017-0170
Qi, W., Jiraporn, P., & Liu, Y. (2024). How do industry tournament incentives affect firm debt maturity? Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102081. doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102081
Rezaei Pitenoei, Y., & Gholamrezapoor, M. (2022). CEO power and labor productivity: An experimental test of tournament theory. Accounting and Auditing Review, 29(1), 96-112. 10.22059/acctgrev.2021.313035.1008461 [In Persian].
Shen, CH., & Lin, CY. (2015). Political connections, financial constraints, and corporate investment. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 47(2), 343-368. org/a/kap/rqfnac/v47y2016i2d10
Simamora, A. J. (2021). Firms performance, risk taking and managerial ability. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. org/a/eme/ijppmp/ijppm-03-2021-0172.
Vrettos, D., (2013). Are relative performance measures in CEO incentive contracts used for risk reduction and/or for strategic interaction? Accounting Review, 88(6), 2179-2212. org/stable/pdf/23525967
Wahinya, P.W., Ondiba, R.O., & Kariuki, P.W. (2023). Competition, risk-taking behavior and stability of commercial banks: evidence from Kenya. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies 14(4), 600-614. org/a/eme/ajemsp/ajems-03-2022-0123
Yin, H., & Zhang, H. (2014). Tournaments of financial analysts. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(2), 573-605. org/a/spr/reaccs/v19y2014i2d10.1007_s11142-013-925
Zhang, K., Yang, Xi., & Gao M. (2023). When to use tournament incentives? Evidence from an investment experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 37, 100777. 10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100777
Zhong, X., Ren, L., & Song, T. (2021). Different effects of internal and external tournament incentives on corporate financial misconduct: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier. 134, 329-341. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 18 May 2026
  • Receive Date: 11 October 2025
  • Revise Date: 04 March 2026
  • Accept Date: 09 May 2026