Presenting a Model for Narrative Accounting: An Action Research Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Accounting, Khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomein, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomein, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Qom University, Qom, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2024.22889.4011

Abstract

Objective: With the paradigmatic changes in accounting knowledge in the last century and the acceptance of social structuralism approaches in this field, today's nature of accounting is moving from the mere quantitative reference of financial reports to the qualitative aspects of information disclosure. Narrative accounting is considered a strategic approach in the new paradigms of accounting knowledge, which aims to strengthen the functions of comprehensive financial information disclosure functions for stakeholders. Narrative accounting is considered one of the most emanating paradigm changes in accounting knowledge, which was a reaction to the vacuum caused by the positivist approach in classical accounting with the perceptual realities of external decision makers. Therefore, since the accounting philosophy based on the classical and objectivist approach was only looking for quantitative reporting, the narrative process in this field to link theory and practice emerged to provide a more attention-worthy answer to the expectations arising from social contexts. In other words, narrative accounting creates a more interactive environment for accounting with stakeholders and can greatly reduce the conflict of interest between companies and stakeholders. Narrative accounting can be considered a level of representation of interactive knowledge and accounting relations with stakeholders, which have arisen by changing the accounting paradigm from classic to modern approaches in this profession and seeking to create value for stakeholders. This research examines narrative accounting based on action research for cognitive classification in capital market companies. The noteworthy point is that although the scope of the function of the narrative process in the knowledge of humanities, especially in culture and management, is considered a tool to objectify the realities. Still, the lack of application of this concept in accounting has caused this knowledge to change even with the change in social expectations and conditions. , cannot become a structure of mutual language between the company and external stakeholders and have positive consequences for balancing the market regarding information symmetry.
Method: This methodological process is called action research, which seeks to cognitively categorize it for implementation by connecting the qualitative aspects of identifying propositions related to the phenomenon under investigation. In this method, also called the type of analytical pragmatism, researchers conduct interviews and open coding to identify propositions so that different aspects of narrative accounting can be phenomenologically studied in this section. In the quantitative part, as a cognitive classification process, the research, by forming a focus group, contextualizes and separates the identified propositions and determines in which category each of the propositions can be placed in the category related to the phenomenon of narrative accounting. Therefore, to follow the path of analysis in this research, it is necessary to create scored questionnaires to determine in which category the experience and knowledge of the focal group place each proposition through the wiremax technique. The formation of the focus group meetings takes place during three stages of conceptualization, exchange, and content recognition so that it is possible to assign the points of each participant to the propositions for the classification of the concept of narrative accounting. Therefore, this study is considered developmental in terms of results and exploratory in terms of purpose, based on the nature of conducting interviews to identify emerging propositions of narrative accounting. In terms of the mixed nature of data collection, as mentioned, this study is considered a mixed study, so in the qualitative part, to conceptualize the phenomenon under investigation, data is collected from interviews with experts, and in the quantitative part, through Q questionnaire score data and analysis. Wiremax determines which category the propositions are classified into.
Results: To achieve validity, similar research was matched to provide the possibility of entering the statements identified in the Q analysis model for the cognitive classification of this phenomenon in the context of capital market companies. In the following, by forming a focus group to determine the cognitive categories of the examined concept during four sessions and by creating a Q evaluation checklist from +5 to -5 in 28 houses according to the identified propositions, the necessary action was taken, and they were asked to understand the problem to place each proposition in one of the 28 houses of Q's evaluation checklist. Then, through the Wiremax matrix, cognitive classes were determined regarding the separation of narrative accounting propositions, and the results indicated the existence of 4 cognitive classes regarding the foundation of narrative accounting at the level of capital market companies.
Conclusion: Based on 4 levels in the foundation of narrative accounting as an action research process at the level of capital market companies, it is possible to get a more comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon. Therefore, based on these 4 categories, the categories assigned to each statement will be expanded. The first category as a research measure for the implementation of narrative accounting in the context of capital market companies is the orientation of the reporting language in the narrative of transparent information to the stakeholders to improve the level of cognitive awareness and judgment of investors and other users of external information. In this category, the accounting unit focuses on announcing a set of reports that are optional for investors, trying to use the capacities of a negative tone to advance their financial strategies in the capital market.
Conclusion: The results showed that narrative accounting, as an emerging part of accounting knowledge, can bring strategic capacities and competitive capabilities of companies in gaining the trust of stakeholders for companies.

Keywords

Main Subjects


ثقفی، مهدی؛ فغانی، مهدی؛ نونهال‌نهر، علی‌اکبر و بشیری‌منش، نازنین (1401). کیفیت گزارشگری مالی، مدیریت لحن گزارش‌های سالانه و حق‌الزحمه غیرعادی حسابرسی. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 11(44)، 159-175 https://www.jmaak.ir/article_18514.html.
رهنمای‌رودپشتی، فریدون و نژادتولمی، بابک (1395). هستی‌شناسی حسابداری مدیریت در بستر پست مدرنیته (اجراگری، کنشگر- شبکه و کاربردها). مجله حسابداری مدیریت، 9(29)، 1-13 https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_9215.html.
رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ نیکومرام، هاشم و نونهال‌نهر، علی‌اکبر (1391). ارزیابی تأثیر رویکردهای قضاوتی و شناختی زبان در گزارش‌های توضیحی حسابداری. بررسی‏‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 19(2)، 47-72 https://www.sid.ir/paper/477075/fa.
رهنمای‌رودپشتی، فریدون و بیات، علی (1391). تعامل سازمانی حسابداری مدیریت و حاکمیت شرکتی: تبیین یک روش نوین برای تفسیر مشکل نمایندگی. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 1(1)، 1-18 https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_7306.html.
شاه‌حسینی، محمدعلی؛ نارنجی‌ثانی، فاطمه و فلاح‌کریمی، صفورا (1394). شناسایی و دسته‌بندی موانع و چالش‌های پیاده‌سازی برنامۀ راهبردی منابع انسانی در شرکت برق منطقه‌ای خراسان به روش کیو. مدیریت دولتی، 7(1)، 89-109 https://jipa.ut.ac.ir/article_52514.html.
شهبازی، رحیم؛ فهیم‌نیا، فاطمه و حکیم‌زاده، رضوان (1395). تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی پرسشنامة تدوین مدل شایستگی آموزش علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی مبتنی بر فناوری اطلاعات براساس تحلیل سرفصل‌ها و نیازهای بازار کار. پردازش و مدیریت دانش اطلاعات، 2(4)، 483-511 https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699349.html.
گیلانی، آتنا؛ صفری‌گرایلی، مهدی؛ رمضانی، جواد؛ رضائیان، رمضان. (1401). طراحی مدل کارکرد استعاره حسابداری گفتمان: نظریه داده ‌بنیاد و تحلیل ماتریس تفسیری فازی (). مجله دانش حسابداری، 13(3)، 195-227 DOI: 10.22103/jak.2021.18394.3603.
موسوی‌نژاد، سید روح‌اله و نمازی، محمد (1395). بررسی کاربرد پژوهش‌های اقدامی در حسابداری. مطالعات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 5(19)، 4-23 https://www.iaaaas.com/article_98656.html.
References
Aerts, W. (1994). On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(4/5), 337–353 https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90001-9.
Aerts, W. (2015). Narrative accounting disclosures. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9781118785317.weom010055.
Alawattage, Ch., Jayathileka, Ch., Hitibandara, R., Withanage, S. (2022). Moral economy, performative materialism, and political rhetorics of sustainability accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 95, 102507 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102507.
Albertini, E., Berger-Remy, F., Lefrancq, S., Morgana, L., Petković, M. and Walliser, E. (2021). Voluntary disclosure and intellectual capital: how CEOs mobilise discretionary accounting narratives to account for value creation stemming from intellectual capital. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 687-705 https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2020-0073.
Angotti, M., Ferreira, A.C.d.S., Eugénio, T., & Branco, M.C. (2022). A narrative approach for reporting social and environmental accounting impacts in the mining sector: Giving marginalized communities a voice. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(1), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2021-1513.
Bąk, M. (2019). Accounting narratives and disclosures in reporting the case of Letters from the Management Board Presidents of selected companies in the light of narrative economics. Economics and Law, 20(2), 213-238 https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2021.013.
Beattie, V. (2014). Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 111-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001.
Beck, C.T. (2019). Introduction to phenomenology: Focus on methodology. Sage Publications https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Phenomenology-Cheryl-Tatano-Beck/dp/154431955X.
Bjurklo, M. (2006). Narrative accounting for competence creation. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(1), 34-47 https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380610672666.
Bourdieu, P. (2016). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 18-31 https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602.
Chariri, A. (2010). Rhetorics in Financial Reporting: An Interpretive Case Study, The Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(2), 84-103 https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.12.2.pp.%2053-70.
Colaizzi, P.F. (1978) Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In: Valle, R.S. and King, M., Eds., Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology, Oxford University Press, New York, 48-71 https://philpapers.org/rec/COLPRA-5.
Connolly, C., & Alpa Virji, D. (2006). Accounting narratives: the reporting practices of British charities. Helmig, B., Hyndman, N., Jergers, M. and Lapsley, I., eds. On the Challenges of Managing the Third Sector, Sonderhefte ZögU, 34(2), 39-62 https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/38544.
De Souza, J.A.S., Rover, J.C.R.S., & Borba, J.A. (2019). The linguistic complexities of narrative accounting disclosure on financial statements: An analysis based on readability characteristics. Research in International Business and Finance, 48(3), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.12.008.
Di Tullio, P., La Torre, M., Dumay, J., & Rea, M.A. (2022). Accountingisation and the narrative (re)turn of business model information in corporate reporting. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(4), 592-615 https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-09-2020-0144.
Diyanty, V. (2019). Accounting information quality, board narrative disclosure, and the cost of debt, advances in economics. Business and Management Research, 2(2), 34-67 https://doi.org/10.2991/apbec-18.2019.36.
Fisher, R.T., Van Staden, C., & Richards, G. (2019). Tone and the Accounting Narrative. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii: Hawaii Accounting Research Conference.
Gelmini, L., Minutiello, V., Tettamanzi, P., & Comoli, M. (2021). Rhetoric, accounting and accountability: COVID-19 and the case of Italy, Sustainability. 13(8), 41-69 https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084100.
Gilani, A., Safari Gerayli, M., Ramezani, J., & Rezaeyan, R. (2022). Designing a metaphor functional model of dialogic accounting: By Grounded theory and fuzzy interpretive matrix analysis. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 13(3), 195-227 DOI: 10.22103/jak.2021.18394.3603 [In Persian].
Godowski, Ch., Negre, E., & Verdier, M.A. (2021). Toward dialogic accounting? Public accountants’ assistance to works councils − A tool between hope and illusion. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 69(3), 124-149 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102095.
Harvey, A., Spicer-Cain, H., Botting, N., Ryan, G., & Henry, L. (2023). Assessing ‘coherence’ in the spoken narrative accounts of autistic people: A systematic scoping review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 102(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102108.
Henwood, K.L. & Pigeon, N.R. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, 83(1), 97-111 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x.
Hoque, Z., Mai, K., & Ozdil, E. (2022). Accounting as rhetorical devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Australian universities, Journal of Public Budgeting. Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 168-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-09-2021-0137.
Jayasinghe, K., & Uddin, S. (2019). Continuity and change in development discourses and the rhetoric role of accounting. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 314-334 https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-01-2018-0011.
Krishnakumar, S., Berdanier, C., Lauff, C., McComb, Ch., & Menold, J. (2022). The story novice designers tell: How rhetorical structures and prototyping shape communication with external audiences. Design Studies, 82(1), 123-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101133.
Marriott, P., & Mcguigan, N. (2018). Visual metaphor and visual tools in accounting education. Accounting Education, 27(6), 549-551 https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1541520.
Masztalerz, M. (2016). Why narratives in accounting? Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2016.434.10.
Michelon, G., Trojanowski, G., Sealy, R. (2022). Narrative Reporting: State of the Art and Future Challenges, Accounting in Europe, 19(1), 7-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2021.1900582
Moosavi Nezhad, S.R., & Namzi, M. (2016). The Investigation of the action research applications in accounting. Accounting and Auditing Studies, 5(19), 4-23 https://www.iaaaas.com/article_98656.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Oduro Amoako, K., Lord, B, R., Dixon, K. (2021). Narrative accounting for mining in Ghana: An old defence against a new threat? 74(4), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102439
Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., & Bayat, A. (2012). Institutional relationship between management accounting and corporate governance: a new institutional method to interpret of agency problem. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 1(1), 1-18 https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_7306.html [In Persian].
Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., & Nejad Toolami, B. (2016). Management accounting ontology in the context of postmodernity (performativity, actant-network and applications). Management Accounting, 9(29), 1-13 https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_9215.html [In Persian].
Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., Nikoomaram, H., & Nonahal Nahr, A.A. (2012). Evaluating the effects of language judgmental and cognitive approaches in accounting narratives. Accounting and Auditing Review, 19(2), 47-72 https://www.sid.ir/paper/477075/fa [In Persian].
Rutherford, B.A. (2016). The struggle to fabricate accounting narrative obfuscation: An actor-network-theoretic analysis of a failing project. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13(1), 57-85 https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-06-2015-0060.
Rutherford, B.A. (2018). Narrating the narrative turn in narrative accounting research: Scholarly knowledge development or flat science? Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(1), 13-43 https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2017-0139.
Rutherford, B.A. (2019). Metaphysics, methodology and theory in classical accounting thought. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(3), 416-447 https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2018-0358.
Rutherford, B.A. (2020). Ironies of narrative accounting research and the case for professional accounting judgement in accounting scholarship. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(2), 229-250 https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2019-0512.
Saghafi, M., Faghani, M., Nonahal Nahr, A.A., & Bashiri Manesh, N. (2022). The financial reporting quality, managing the tone of annual reports and abnormal audit fee. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 11(44), 159-175 https://www.jmaak.ir/article_18514.html? lang=en [In Persian].
Senn, J., Luque-Vílchez, M., & Larrinaga, C. (2022). The role of accounting in the assessment of knowledge production from a multi-stakeholder’s perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(5), 1033-1059 https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2021-0437.
Shahbazi, R., Fahimnia, F., & Hakimzadeh, R. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis of IT-based competency questionnaire in information science & knowledge studies, based on job market analysis. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 483-511 https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699349.html [In Persian].
Shahhoseini, M.A., Narenji Sani, F., & Fallah Karimi, S. (2015). Recognizing and categorizing challenges for implementing human resources strategy in Khorasan regional electric company. Journal of Public Administration, 7(1), 89-109 https://jipa.ut.ac.ir/article_52514.html [In Persian].
Taïbi, S., Antheaume, N., & Gibassier, D. (2020). Accounting for strong sustainability: an intervention-research based approach. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1213-1243 https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2017-0105.
Tran, L.T.H., Tu, T.T.K., Nguyen, T.T.H., Nguyen, H.T.L., & Vo, X.V. (2023). Annual report narrative disclosures, information asymmetry and future firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(2), 351-375 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2020-0925.
Yen, A.C., Riley, T.J., & Liao, P. (2017). Chinese vs US investors’ reactions to accounting narratives: An experiment. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(4), 526-548 https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-12-2016-0144.