Designing the Thematic Model and Interpretive Ranking of the Rhetorical Accounting Development Drivers

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Accounting, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Accounting, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Parand, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Ilkhchi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilkhchi, Iran.

Abstract

Objective: According to classical myths, accounting has had a purely mechanical and proof function, while with social changes and the development of knowledge in this field, accounting has become a part of interactionist functions with social expectations by distancing itself from objectivist bases. The concept “rhetoric” is the art of persuasive writing or speaking by using words or languages in a certain way (symbolically or metaphorically) to convey meaning or persuade targeted readers or audiences. Rhetorical devices appeal to an audience’s emotions, sense of logic or perception of authority. This study aims to design the thematic model and interpretive ranking of the rhetorical accounting development drivers in Iran's capital market.
Method: This study is a developmental and mixed methodology; thematic analysis and Delphi were used in the qualitative part, and the interpretive ranking process was used in the quantitative part. This research is inductive/deductive from a philosophical point of view. For this reason, it is an inductive approach that investigates the drivers of rhetorical accounting through modeling, which there is no comprehensive theory about at the level of stock exchange companies. It is not without grace to add that in exploratory research, it is not possible to formulate a hypothesis and also, the theoretical coherence about the subject under investigation is not developed in terms of the research method; instead of using predefined theories, the present study it tries to use the interview process to collect data and code it to present a model in study contexts. On the other hand, for this reason, the present study is an analogy that, after presenting the model, explains it among capital market companies to evaluate the priority of each of the main drivers of rhetorical accounting development in the capital market based on the interpretative ranking process. In the qualitative part, first through content screening, overarching themes were identified, then through interviews with 12 accounting experts, efforts were made to determine basic and organizing themes in the form of a six-dimensional model. The identified dimensions were evaluated to determine reliability through Delphi analysis. In the quantitative part, 29 managers of capital market companies participated in the year 2021 to perform the interpretive ranking process through the pairwise comparison matrix.
Results: The research results in the qualitative part through the design of the thematic model through the conduct of 12 interviews indicate the existence of three overarching themes. It has 6 organizing themes and 30 basic themes regarding the drivers of rhetorical accounting development. On the other hand, the results in the quantitative section showed that the strengthening of the information system in accounting knowledge is considered the most important driver of the development of rhetorical accounting, which can increase the possibility of creating interactive content and linguistic transparency between accounting and stakeholders to improve their decision-making power.
Conclusion: The obtained results indicate that the selection of the theme of strengthening the information system of accounting knowledge as the most effective driver regarding the accounting function means that increasing the communication channels between the accounting unit and the social platforms can strengthen and develop the knowledge of expectations and information needs. Accounting units and systematically should help stakeholders; accounting processes can provide more reliable data to stakeholders for decision-making. It should also be stated that the development of information systems at various operational to strategic levels in the accounting unit, based on continuous screening of the environment in terms of identifying such expectations, helps to reflect the best decision to the stakeholders as soon as possible. Also, the existence of the database created as the main source of such changes helps the accounting profession to have a higher capacity for enhanced reflection of news and information to satisfy the information needs of the stakeholders and on the other hand to help reduce agency costs by interacting more with the stakeholders. Because the goal of rhetorical accounting is to increase transparency and the level of mutual communication between accounting and stakeholders, the strengthening of information systems provides this opportunity for the accounting unit to be able to absorb external knowledge based on the demands and needs of stakeholders on the one hand. On the other hand, changing it based on strategies and operational processes will provide them with reliable and timely financial reporting and a more significant response as the system's output.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

تفتیان، اکرم؛ ناظمی‌اردکانی، مهدی و فتوحی‌خانکهدانی، محبوبه (1400). ارزیابی تأثیر مقوله‌های الگوی افشای اطلاعات آینده‌نگر. دانش حسابداری مالی، 8(1)، 65-92 https://jfak.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_2374.html.
جلالی، رستم (۱۳۹۱). نمونه‌گیری در پژوهش‌های کیفی. تحقیقات کیفی در علوم سلامت، ۱(۴)، ۳۱۰-۳۲۰ https://www.sid.ir/paper/215407/fa.
داداشی، ایمان و نوروزی، محمد (1399). بررسی اثر میانجی خوانایی گزارشگری مالی بر رابطه بین مدیریت سود و هزینه سرمایه. مجله دانش حسابداری، 11(1)، 135-157 DOI: 10.22103/jak.2020.11718.2629.
دهقانی فیروزآبادی، حامد (1392). رویکرد عقل‌گرایانه به دانش بلاغت، پیامدها و بازتاب‌ها. پژوهشنامه نقد ادبی و بلاغت، 1(2)، 21-34 https://jlcr.ut.ac.ir/article_35255.html.
رنجبر، هادی؛ حق‌دوست، علی اکبر؛ صلصالی، مهوش؛ خوشدل، علیرضا؛ سلیمانی، محمدعلی و بهرامی، نسیم (۱۳۹۱). نمونه‌گیری در پژوهش‌های کیفی: راهنمایی برای شروع. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران، ۱۰(۳)، ۲۳۸-۲۵۰ https://www.sid.ir/paper/96654/fa.
رهنمای‌رودپشتی، فریدون و نژادتولمی، بابک (1395). هستی‌شناسی حسابداری مدیریت در بستر پست مدرنیته (اجراگری، کنشگر- شبکه و کاربردها). مجله حسابداری مدیریت، 9(29)، 1-13 https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_9215.html.
کوزه‌گر، پریناز؛ پورزمانی، زهرا؛ توانگر، پریناز و معدنچی‌زاج، مهدی (1400). بررسی تأثیر نگرش فلسفی بر درک سطح خوانایی استانداردهای بین‌المللی گزارشگری مالی. مجله حسابداری مدیریت، 14(49)، 1-14 https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_18300.html.
گیلانی، آتنا؛ صفری‌گرایلی، مهدی؛ رمضانی، جواد و رضائیان، رمضان (1401). طراحی مدل کارکرد استعاره حسابداری گفتمان: نظریه داده بنیاد و تحلیل ماتریس تفسیری فازی (). مجله دانش حسابداری، 13(3)، 195-227 DOI: 10.22103/jak.2021.18394.3603.
References
Alawattage, Ch., Jayathileka, Ch., Hitibandara, R., Withanage, S. (2022). Moral economy, performative materialism, and political rhetorics of sustainability accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 95, 1025507 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102507.
Aly, D., El-Halaby, S., & Hussainey, K. (2018). Tone disclosure and financial performance: Evidence from Egypt. Accounting Research Journal, 31(1), 63-74 https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2016-0123.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405 https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307.
Bourdieu, P. (2016). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 18-31 https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602.
Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis andcode development, Sage Publications, Inc https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-08155-000.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Chariri, A. (2010). Rhetorics in financial reporting: An interpretive case study. The Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(2), 84-103 https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.12.2.pp.%2053-70.
Chithambaranathan, P., Subramanian, N., & Palaniappan, P.K. (2015). An innovative framework for performance analysis of members of supply chains. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(2), 309-334
Craig, R., & Amernic, J. (2004). The deployment of accounting-related rhetoric in the prelude to a privatization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(1), 41–58 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570410525201.
Dadashi, I., & Norouzi, M. (2020). Investigating the mediating effect of financial reporting readability on the relationship between earnings management and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 11(1), 135-157 DOI: 10.22103/jak.2020.11718.2629 [In Persian].
Dehghani Firouzabadi, H. (2012). A rationalist approach to the science of rhetoric, consequences and reflections. Research Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric, 1(2), 21-34 https://jlcr.ut.ac.ir/article_35255.html [In Persian].
Doris, M., Merkl-Davies N., & Brennan, M. (2017). A theoretical framework of external accounting communication: Research perspectives. Traditions, and Theories, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 1-56 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2039.
Epurescu-Pascovici, I. (2023). Medieval accountability: normativity, numeracy, and rhetoric from the institutional to the domestic sphere. The Calendar for the Humanities and Social Sciences, https://calenda.org/1014940.
Gelmini, L, Minutiello, V, Tettamanzi, P., and Comoli, M. (2021). Rhetoric, accounting and accountability: COVID-19 and the case of Italy. Sustainability, 13(8), 41-69 https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084100.
Gilani, A., Safari Gerayeli, M., Ramezani, J., & Rezaeyan, R. (2022). Designing a metaphor functional model of dialogic accounting: By Grounded Theory and Fuzzy interpretive matrix analysis. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 13(3), 195-227 DOI: 10.22103/jak.2021.18394.3603 [In Persian].
Giovannoni, E., Napier, Ch, J. (2022). Multimodality and the Messy Object: Exploring how rhetoric and materiality engage, Organization Studies, 1(1), 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221089598.
Green, S.E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653-669 DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2004.14497653.
Grossi, G., Biancone, P.P., Secinaro, S., & Brescia, V. (2021). Dialogic accounting through popular reporting and digital platforms. Meditari Accountancy Research, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2021-1163
Henwood, K.L. & Pigeon, N.R. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, 83(1), 97-111 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x.
Higgins, C., & Walker, R. (2012). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Account Forum, 36(2), 194–208 https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/accfor/v36y2012i3p194-208.html.
Hoque, Z., Mai, K., & Ozdil, E. (2022). Accounting as rhetorical devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Australian universities. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 168-192 https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-09-2021-0137.
Jalali, R. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research, Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 1(4), 310-320 https://www.sid.ir/paper/215407/fa [In Persian].
Jayasinghe, K., & Uddin, S. (2019). Continuity and change in development discourses and the rhetoric role of accounting. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 314-334 https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-01-2018-0011.
Jiménez-Angueira, C.E., Nwaeze, E., & Park, S.J. (2021). The effect of conservative financial reporting and tax aggressiveness on the market valuation of unrecognized tax benefits. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(2), 150-172 https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-07-2020-0111.
Johnston, A., Di Gangi, P.M., Bélanger, F., Crossler, R.E., Siponen, M., Warkentin, M., & Singh, T. (2023). Seeking rhetorical validity in fear appeal research: An application of rhetorical theory. Computers & Security, 125(2), 73-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.103020.
Jones, A., & Willis, M. (2003). The challenge of XBRL: business reporting for the investor. Balance Sheet, 11(3), 29-37 https://doi.org/10.1108/09657960310491172.
Jonsen, K., & Jehn, K.A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 4(2), 123-150 https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391.
Koozehgar, P., Pourzamani, Z., Tavangar, A., & Madanchi Zaj, M. (2021). Investigating the effect of philosophical attitude on understanding the level of readability of international financial reporting standards. Management Accounting, 14(49), 1-14 https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_18300.html [In Persian].
Krishnakumar, S., Berdanier, C., Lauff, C., McComb, Ch., & Menold, J. (2022). The story novice designers tell: How rhetorical structures and prototyping shape communication with external audiences. Design Studies, 82(1), 123-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101133.
Littlejohn, S.W., & Foss, K.A. (2011). Theories of human communication. Tenth Edition, Waveland Press, Long Grove IL https://www.amazon.com/Theories-Human-Communication-Stephen-Littlejohn/dp/1577667069.
Malthus, S., & Fowler, C. (2009). Perceptions of accounting: A qualitative New Zealand study. Pacific Accounting Review, 21(1), 26-47 https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580910956849.
Marriott, P., & Mcguigan, N. (2018). Visual metaphor and visual tools in accounting education. Accounting Education, 27(6), 549-551 https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1541520.
McLeod, M.S., Sears, J.B., Chandler, G.N., Payne, G.T., & Brigham, K.H. (2022). Rhetoric, risk, and investment: Letting the numbers speak for themselves. Journal of Management Studies, 59(7), 1657-1687 https://doi.org/ 10.1111/joms.12812.
Melissa Walters York, L. (1996). Metaphor in accounting discourse. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(5), 45-70 https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610367242.
Nwagbara, U., & Belal, A. (2019). Persuasive language of responsible organisation? A critical discourse analysis of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports of Nigerian oil companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2395-2420 https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2485.
Paugam, L., Stolowy, H., & Gendron, Y. (2021). Deploying narrative economics to understand financial market dynamics: An analysis of activist short sellers' rhetoric. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1809-1848 https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12660.
Price, M., Harvey, C., Maclean, M., & Campbell, D. (2018). From cadbury to kay: Discourse, intertextuality and the evolution of UK corporate governance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1542-1562 https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1955.
Qian, Y., & Sun, Y. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of literature on narrative discourse in corporate annual reports (1990–2019). Quality & Quantity, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01135-5.
Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., & Nejad Toolami, B. (2016). Management accounting ontology in the context of postmodernity (performativity, actant-network and applications). Management Accounting, 9(29), 1-13 https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_9215.html [In Persian].
Ranjbar, H., Akbar Haghdoost, A., Salsali, M., Khoshdel, A., Soleimani, M., & Bahrami, N. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: A Guide for beginning, Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research, 10(3), 238-250 https://www.sid.ir/paper/96654/fa [In Persian].
Rutherford, B.A. (2002). The production of narrative accounting statements: An exploratory study of the operating and financial review. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 6(3), 25-56 https://doi.org/10.1108/96754260280001031.
Semeen, H., & Islam, M. (2021). Social impact disclosure and symbolic power: Evidence from UK fair trade organizations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79(1), 76-98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102182.
Sushil, A. (2017a). Multi- criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with a big data framework. Production Planning & Control, 28(11/12), 999-1010
Taftiyan, A., Nazmi Ardakani, M., & Fotouhi Khankahdani, M. (2021). Evaluating the impact of the categories of the Forward-Looking information disclosure pattern. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 8(28), 65-92 https://jfak.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_2374.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Wu, Y.J., & Goh, M. (2023). Does endorsement rhetoric matter in citizen science? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2152295.
Wastell, D.G. (2001). Barriers to effective knowledge management: Action research meets grounded theory. Journal of Systems&Information Technology, 5(2), 21–35 https://doi.org/10.1108/13287260180000764.
Yan, B., Aerts, W., & Thewissen, J. (2019). The in formativeness of impression management: Financial analysts and rhetorical style of CEO letters. Pacific Accounting Review, 31(3), 462-496 https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-09-2017-0063.
Yen, A.C., Riley, T.J., & Liao, P. (2017). Chinese vs US investors’ reactions to accounting narratives: An experiment. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(4), 526-548 https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-12-2016-0144.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 05 April 2023
  • Revise Date: 31 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 25 September 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics