The Role of Management Style in Cost Stickiness and Shareholder Value

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Faculty of management, economic & accounting, Payame Noor University (PNU), Iran.

10.22103/jak.2023.20334.3783

Abstract

Objective: This research aims to investigate the effect of management style on the stickiness of general, administrative and sales costs at the company level and its impact on shareholder value. The problem is whether the choices and decisions (management style) of CEOs affect the stickiness of administrative and sales costs, and if the management style causes part of the stickiness of costs, is this part of the excess stickiness of costs a consequence of Worth participating? Therefore, in the current research, the excess stickiness of administrative and sales costs compared to the specific stickiness of the company is considered the stickiness caused by the CEO's choices and decisions. Then, its relationship with the company's value is investigated. The direct influence of CEOs on cost adjustment decisions is not easily discernible. Because resource allocation decisions are made at different levels of the company (for example, business unit level). However, the empirical background shows that the hypothesis "the role of manager's style in cost adjustment decisions" is logically provable. Based on this, it is assumed that part of the stickiness of administrative and sales costs at the company level comes from the difference in the specific style of the CEO. In this regard, the first hypothesis is formulated as follows: the fixed effects of the CEO have a significant relationship with the excess stickiness of administrative and sales costs at the company level. Managers seek to increase their personal interests without paying attention to the interests of the shareholders, and the resulting agency costs are directly imposed on the company and shareholders. Therefore, we expect that regardless of the direction of the deviation, the excess stickiness related to the CEO has a negative effect on shareholder value. Of course, adjustment of resources and costs can be caused by supervision and supervision duties. However, it is expected that, on average, the expected effects of the agency model will prevail. Therefore, the second hypothesis of the current research is formulated as follows: the level of excess stickiness of administrative and sales expenses related to the CEO has a negative relationship with shareholder value.
 Method: In the present study, the relationship between the excess adhesion of administrative and sales costs resulting from the decisions of CEOs and shareholder value was investigated. Based on agency theory and neoclassical theory, it was expected that CEOs would be significantly  effective in the level of cost stickiness due to their unique management style. Therefore, research hypotheses were formulated based on the identification of the fixed effects of the CEO on the stickiness of administrative and sales costs and the negative relationship between the stickiness of the surplus related to the CEO and shareholder value, and based on the company's 2016 information from the Tehran Stock Exchange during 2010- 2019; it was tested using multiple regression analysis.
 Results: The results indicate that CEOs play a significant role in the stickiness of general and sales costs, and management style has a positive relationship in the stickiness of costs with shareholder value.
 Conclusion: The results of this research are among the first pieces of evidence showing that managers' selection and decision-making style affect cost stickiness, which can be useful for the company and shareholders. In the current research, in accordance with previous research and our expectations, the effect of CEO selection and decision-making style on cost stickiness was confirmed. However, contrary to previous research, a positive relationship between CEO and company value was obtained. In other words, the manager's decisions regarding cost management are not based on personal motives but on increasing the company's value (based on Q. Tobin's criteria). Since the second research hypothesis is based on agency theory, it can be argued that incentives and other methods of reducing agency problems have reduced the conflict between owners and managers. This is an issue that can be further investigated in future research. However, building a model that controls all economic determinants is challenging. Also, the variable measurement indices may not be complete. Nevertheless, the research findings provide evidence of the effect of management style on cost stickiness. The present research and related research can help develop an experimental model to detect bad or good cost stickiness.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

پورساسان، سیمین و حصارزاده، رضا (1395). بررسی فرضیه‌های چسبندگی هزینه‌ها: شواهدی درباره انگیزه‌های سازمانی و انگیزه‌های شخصی مدیران. پیشرفت‌های حسابداری، 8(1)، 48-25 https://jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3851.html.
حسینی‌پور، رضا؛ نصیرزاده، فرزانه؛ عباس‌زاده، محمدرضا (1398). عوامل تعیین کننده رفتار چسبندگی هزینه‌ها. مجله دانش حسابداری، 10(4)، 214-177 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2460.html.
حقیقت، حمید و مرتضوی، سیدمرتضی (1393). بررسی تأثیر رفتار هزینه‌های عملیاتی بر سودآوری آینده. مجله دانش حسابداری، 5(18)، 24-7 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_857.html.
رستگاری، امیرحسین؛ حصارزاده، رضا و ساعی، محمدجواد (1400). بررسی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی عمومی بر رفتار نا متقارن هزینه. مجله دانش حسابداری، 12(1)، 44-19 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2788.html.
سجادی، سید حسین؛ حاجی‌زاده، سعید و نیک کار، جواد (1393). تأثیر چسبندگی هزینه بر تقارن زمانی سود با تاکید بر ارتباط میان چسبندگی هزینه و محافظه کاری شرطی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 5(16)، 99-810 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_662.html.
سلیمانی امیری، غلامرضا؛ طباطبائیان، مریم السادات و معصومه بیلندی، زهرا (1397). چسبندگی هزینه و مدیریت سود با تمرکز بر انگیزه‌های مدیریتی در صنعت سیمان. مجله دانش حسابداری، 9(4)، 151-129 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2182.html.
کردستانی، غلامرضا و مرتضوی، مرتضی (1391). بررسی تأثیر تصمیمات سنجیده مدیران بر چسبندگی هزینه‌ها. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 19(67)،90-73 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_28798.html?lang=fa.
علی‌احمدی، سعید؛ سروش‌یار، افسانه و دادخواه، مهدی (1394). ارزیابی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر چسبندگی هزینه شرکت. دانش حسابداری مالی،2(4)، 153-137 https://jfak.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1252_0.html.
منصورفر، غلامرضا؛ حیدری، مهدی و کولانی، طاهره (1396). بررسی تأثیر مدیریت واقعی سود و انگیزه‌های مدیریتی بر چسبندگی هزینه. مدیریت دارایی و تأمین مالی، 5(1)، 16-1 https://amf.ui.ac.ir/article_21149.html?lang=fa.
نمازی، محمد و دوانی‌پور، ایرج (1389). بررسی تجربی رفتار چسبندگی هزینه‌ها در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 17(62)، 102-85 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_22520.html?lang=fa.
References
Ali Ahmadi, S., Soroushyar, A., & Dadkhah, M. (2014). Evaluating the role of social capital on firm's cost stickiness. Knowledge of Financial Accounting, 2(4), 153-137 https://jfak.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1252_0.html [In Persian].
Anderson, M., Banker, R., Huang, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2007). Cost behaviorand fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22, 1–28 https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0702200103.
Anderson, M.C., Banker, R.D., & Janakiraman, S.N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs "sticky"? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63 https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095.
Anderson, M.C., Lee, J.H., & Mashruwala, R. (2016). Cost stickinesss and cost inertia: A two-driver model of asymmetric cost behavior. Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal, 1-45 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2599108.
Balakrishnan, R., & Gruca, T.S. (2008). Cost stickiness and core competency: A note.  Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 993–1006 https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.4.2.
Balakrishnan, R., Petersen, M.J., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2004). Does capacity utilization affect the “stickiness” of cost?  Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19(3), 283–300 https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0401900303.
Bamber, L.S., Jiang, J., & Wang, I.Y. (2010). What's my style? The influence of top managers on voluntary corporate financial disclosure.  The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1131–1162 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20744154.
Banker, R.D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric cost behavior.  Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43–79 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2312779.
Banker, R.D., Byzalov, D., & Chen, L. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior.  Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111–127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.003.
Banker, R.D., Byzalov, D., Ciftci, M., & Mashruwala, R. (2014). The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior.  Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 221–242 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.902546.
Banker, R.D., Byzalov, D., Fang, S., Liang, Y. (2018). Cost management research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 187-209 https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51965.
Bartov, E., Gul, F.A., & Tsui, J.S.L. (2000). Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications.  Conference Issue on Contemporary Financial Reporting Issues, 30(3), 421–452 https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0165-4101(01)00015-5.
Bates, T.W., Kahle, K.M., & Stulz, R.M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to?  Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.927962.
Berson, Y., Oreg, S., & Dvir, T. (2008). CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes.  Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(5), 615–633 https://www.jstor.org/stable/30162650.
Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies.  Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208 https://www.jstor.org/stable/25053937.
Brick, I.E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J.K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism?  Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403–423 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin. 2005.08.005.
Brochet, F., Faurel, L., & McVay, S.E. (2011). Manager-specific effects on earnings guidance: An analysis of top executive turnovers.  Journal of Accounting Research, 49(5), 1123–1162 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41328954.
Cadman, B., & Sunder, J. (2014). Investor horizon and CEO horizon incentives.  The Accounting Review, 89(4), 1299–1328 https://www.jstor.org/stable/24468342.
Capozza, D.R., & Seguin, P.J. (1998). Managerial style and firm value.  Real Estate Economics, 26(1), 131–150 https://public.websites.umich.edu/~reecon/restate/faculty/Capozza/ga112096.pdf.
Chen, C.R., & Steiner, T.L. (2000). Tobin's q, managerial ownership, and analyst coverage.  Journal of Economics and Business, 52(4), 365–382 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(00)00024-2.
Chen, C.X., Gores, T., & Nasev, J. (2013). Managerial overconfidence and cost stickiness. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2208622.
Chen, C.X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x.
Chen, J.V., Kama, I., & Lehavy, R. (2017). The tone of management forward looking statements and asymmetric cost behavior. Business, Stephen M. Ross School of Working Papers Series, 1-36 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2684164.
Choi, J.H., Kim, J.B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality?  AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 115–140 https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.115.
Ciftci, M., Mashruwala, R., & Weiss, D. (2016). Implications of cost behavior for analysts' earnings forecasts.  Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(1), 57–80 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2327167.
Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. https://us.sagepub.com/ sites/default/files/upm-assets/5029_book_item_5029.pdf.
Davis, A.K., Ge, W., Matsumoto, D., & Zhang, J.L. (2015). The effect of manager-specific optimism on the tone of earnings conference calls.  Review of Accounting Studies, 20(2), 639–673 https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s11142-014-9309-4.
Dezsö, C.L., & Ross, D.G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation.  Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955.
Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle.  The Accounting Review, 86(6), 1969–1994 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41408043.
Dierynck, B., Landsman, W.R., & Renders, A. (2012). Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms.  The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1219–1246 https://www.jstor.org/stable/23246275.
Edmans, A., Fang, Vivian W., Lewellen, K.A. (2015). Equity vesting and managerial myopia. https://www.nber.org/ papers/w19407.
Falato, A., Li, D., & Milbourn, T. (2015). Which skills matter in the market for CEOs? Evidence from pay for CEO credentials.  Management Science, 61(12), 2845–2869 https://www.jstor.org/stable/24551562.
Gabaix, X., & Landier, A. (2008). Why has CEO pay increased so much?  Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 49–100 https://www.jstor.org/stable/25098894.
Gaspar, J.M., & Massa, M. (2011). The role of commonality between CEO and divisional managers in internal capital markets.  Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(03), 841–869 https://www.jstor.org/ stable/23018550.
Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting.  Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3), 3–73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002.
Graham, J.R., Li, S., & Qiu, J. (2012). Managerial attributes and executive compensation.  Review of Financial Studies, 25(1), 144–186 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr076.
Griffith, J.M. (1999). CEO ownership and firm value.  Managerial and Decision Economics, 20(1), 1–8 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3108210.
Haghighat, H., & Mortazavi, S.M. (2014). Investigating of the impact of selling, general, and administrative costs behavior on future profitability. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 5(18), 7-24 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_857. html?lang=en [In Persian].
Hartlieb, S., Loy, T., Eierle, B. (2020). Does community social capital affect asymmetric cost behavior? Management Accounting Research, 46, 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2019.02.002.
Himmelberg, C.P., Hubbard, R.G., & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance.  Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 353–384 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00025-2.
Hosseinipour, R., Nassirzadeh, F., & Abbaszadeh, M.R. (2020). Determinants of sticky cost behavior. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 10(4), 177-214 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2460.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Huselid, M.A., Jackson, S.E., & Schuler, R.S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resources management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance.  Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171–188 https://www.jstor.org/stable/257025.
Hoyt, R.E., & Liebenberg, A.P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management.  Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795–822 https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x.
Jung, H.W., & Subramanian, A. (2017). CEO talent, CEO compensation, and product market competition.  Journal of Financial Economics, 125(1), 48–71 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.04.005.
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs?  Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201–224 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00471.x.
Kaspereit, T., Lopatta, K., & Onnen, D. (2017). Shareholder value implications of compliance with the German corporate governance code.  Managerial and Decision Economics, 38(2), 166–177 https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2750.
Kitching, K., Mashruwala, R., & Pevzner, M. (2016). Culture and cost stickiness: A cross-country study.  International Journal of Accounting, 51(3), 402–417 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2016.07.010.
Kordestani, Gh., & Mortazavi, S.M. (2012). The impact of managers’ deliberate decisions on costs’ stickiness. Accounting and Auditing Review, 19(67), 73-90 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_28798.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Lang, L.H.P., & Stulz, R.M. (1994). Tobin's q, corporate diversification, and firm performance.  Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1248–1280 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2138786.
Liu, P., & Nguyen, H.T. (2020). CEO Characteristics and Tone at the Top Inconsistency. Journal of Economics and Business, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2019.105887.
Lopatta, K., Kaspereit, T., & Gastone, L.M. (2020). Managerial style in cost asymmetry and shareholder value.  Management Decision Economic, 41, 800–826 https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3139.
Maher, M.W., Stickney, C.P., Weil, R.L. (2008). Manangerial accounting: An introduction to concepts, methods and uses (10th ed.). Manson: Thomson Higher Education. https://www.amazon.com/Managerial-Accounting-Introduction-Concepts-Methods/dp/0324639767.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction.  Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 20–43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002.
Mansourfar, Gh., Heidari, M., & Colani, T. (2017). The effect of real earnings management and managerial incentives on sticky costs. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 5(1), 1-16 https://amf.ui.ac.ir/article_ 21149.html?lang=en [In Persian].
March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Organizations (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://www.amazon.com/Organizations-James-G-March/dp/063118631X.
Merchant, K.A. (1990). The effects of financial controls on data manipulation and management myopia.  Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(4), 297–313 https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90021-L.
Namazi, M., & Davanipour, I. (2010). Empirical evaluation of the sticky behavior of costs in the Tehran Stock Exchange market. Accounting and Auditing Review, 17(4), 85-186 https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_22520.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Noreen, E. (1991). Conditions under which activity-based cost systems provide relevant costs.  Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3(4), 159–168 https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/u.osu.edu/dist/8/36875/files/2016/12/Noreen-JMAR-1991-vrlob7.pdf.
Poursasan, S., & Hesarzadeh, R. (2016). Investigating the competing theories of sticky costs: evidence of organizational incentives and managerial incentives. Journal of Accounting Advances, 8(1), 25-48 https://jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/article_3851.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Pouryousof, A. Nassirzadeh, F. Hesarzadeh, R. Askarany, D. (2022). The relationship between managers’ disclosure tone and the trading volume of investors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, Descember 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120618.
Rajan, R., Servaes, H., & Zingales, L. (2000). The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and inefficient investment.  Journal of Finance, 55(1), 35–80 https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00200.
Rastegari, A., Hesarzadeh, R., & Saey, M. (2021). The impact of community social capital on asymmetric behavior of cost. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 12(1), 19-44 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2788.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Rotemberg, J.J., & Saloner, G. (2000). Visionaries, managers, and strategic direction.  RAND Journal of Economics, 31(4), 693–716 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2696355.
Sajadi, S.H., Hajizadeh, S., & Nikkar, J. (2014). Effect of cost stickiness on symmetry time profit with emphasis on relationship between cost stickiness and conditional conservatism. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 5(16), 81-99 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_662.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Soleimani Amiri, Gh., Tabatabaeian, M.S., & Masumi Bilandy, Z. (2019). cost stickiness and income smoothing with focus on management motives in cement industry. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 9(4), 129-151 https://jak.uk.ac.ir/article_2182.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Van der Stede, W.A. (2000). The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: Budgetary slack creation and managerial shortterm orientation.  Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(6), 609–622 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00058-6.
Vomberg, A., Homburg, C., & Bornemann, T. (2015). Talented people and strong brands: The contribution of human capital and brand equity to firm value.  Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), 2122–2131 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2328.
Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts' earnings forecasts.  The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441–1471 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20744165.
Xuan, Y. (2009). Empire-building or bridge-building? Evidence from new CEOs' internal capital allocation decisions.  Review of Financial Studies, 22(12), 4919–4948 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp030.
Yang, H.I. (2012). Capital market consequences of managers' voluntary disclosure styles.  Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 167–184 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.08.003.
Zhu, W., & Xu, X.E. (2011). Second-mover advantages with asymmetric costs and information updates: A product life cycle perspective.  Managerial and Decision Economics, 32(8), 527–533 https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1552.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 08 October 2022
  • Revise Date: 17 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 17 July 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics