The Perspective of Faculty Members of Iranian State Universities about the Influential Factors on Effectiveness of Accounting Teaching

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Accounting, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 M.A. of Accounting, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2022.18657.3631

Abstract

Objective: Today, the focus on improved education quality and effectiveness in every academic area is of utmost significance, especially as a strategy to enhance the prowess of the graduates of that academic field. The reason is that it substantially impacts improving the quality and maintaining the prestige and status of that academic field. Any academic field's quality depends on the service it provides to society as its core obligation. The main task of the accounting field in a community is to offer effective and dependable financial information related to economic enterprises and deliver it to different user groups who make economic decisions based on this information. As university graduates of accounting, accountants are instantly involved in selecting the type and amount of accounting information and preparing and reporting it. The quality of accounting information relies on the quality of accountants' knowledge which, in turn, depends on the quality of education planned for them in the university. The quality of accounting education is closely connected to how accounting professors teach at universities. Consequently, accounting professors must strive to improve the quality of teaching in accounting. The purpose of the present study is to identify the factors affecting the quality level and teaching effectiveness of accounting instructors as the main factor in improving the quality and effectiveness of accounting education. This study was performed for the first time to specify and present the stimuli with a promising effect on teaching effectiveness. It was also conducted to identify and offer factors and behaviors that adversely impact teaching effectiveness. To have a thorough knowledge of these factors, suggestions made by accounting professors were willingly applied. It is hoped that such knowledge will help the professors to observe positive factors in teaching effectiveness and avoid negative factors in their teaching process. It is expected that in case the goal of this research is realized, it will help to employ an integrated, effective teaching process in the field of accounting in universities across the country, as well as to reduce possible inadequacies in the current teaching process.
 Methods: This study surveyed accounting faculty members of state universities. Therefore, research data was collected using a questionnaire with open-ended items. It included three parts, namely, "Introduction, Personal, Academic and Experimental Records for the Respondents", "Request for the introduction of effective teaching stimuli", and "Request for the introduction of behaviors that reduce the effectiveness of teaching”. In this survey, the statistical society was asked to present factors with desirable effects and/or behaviors with undesirable effects on teaching effectiveness in the accounting discipline. The content analysis method analyzed the members' proposed effective factors.
 Results: A total of 70 accounting faculty members participated in this survey, resulting in the identification of 579 effective factors, from which 310 items deal with factors with positive effects and269 items deal with factors with undesirable effects. Given the consensus among survey participants on the effective factors, repeated factors identified were classified into 6 general classes of factors with desirable effects and 12 with undesirable factors on teaching effectiveness. From among the identified factors, factors such as the dominance of the professor on the subject being taught, the professor's interest in accounting, teaching in this field and the subject being taught, active participation of students in classroom topics and use of credible teaching resources by the latest scientific achievements, as factors with desirable effect, and lack of appropriate structural and environmental conditions, student's low interest, motivation and scientific level, the professor's insufficient dominance on the subject and their inattention and improper ethical behavior toward the student were emphasized by the subjects as factors with undesirable effects on the effectiveness of teaching. The research findings align with Sherman et al. (1987) the quest for excellence in university teaching; Young & Shaw's (1999) profiles of effective college and university teachers; Stice & Stocks (2000) on effective teaching techniques; Polk's (2006) traits of effective teachers; Gurney (2007) five factors for effective teaching; Aregbeyen (2010) Students Perceptions of Effective Teaching and effective lecturer characteristics at the university of Ibadan, Nigeria; Stout & Wygal (2010) negative behaviors that impede learning: survey findings from award-winning accounting educators; Delaney et al. (2010) students' perceptions of effective teaching in higher education; Wygal, Watty & Stout (2014) drivers of teaching effectiveness; Wygal & Stout (2015) shining a light on effective teaching best practices. This indicates the high validity of the findings of this study. Therefore, using the factors identified in this study into the teaching process of accounting professors can increase the quality and effectiveness of their teaching.
 Conclusion: The result of the study suggests that about the factors with desirable effects, a significant emphasis of accounting Instructors in the statistical population was on "the factors dealing with educational content and teaching tools and methods" and "factors dealing with instructor characteristics" and about undesirable effects, the significant consensus was on "structural and environmental factors", "low interest, motivation and scientific level of students", “instructor’s lack of mastery on the topic being taught”, and “instructor’s inattention or improper moral behavior toward students” as the factors influencing teaching in the accounting discipline. Hence, according to the agreement between the accounting faculty members on the factors affecting the effectiveness of teaching identified in this research, the following are suggested: To better enhance their teaching, professors active in the field of teaching accounting add to their agenda the factors with promising impacts on the effectiveness of teaching recognized in this research, implement them in practice and during training, and avoid the factors with an adverse influence on the teaching effectiveness as identified in the teaching process.

Keywords

References

اسدیان، سیروس؛ پیری، موسی و سعادت فر، رحمت (1396). تدریس اثربخش در آموزش عالی بر اساس تجارب حرفه‌ای استادان و ارتباط آن با تدریس خودگزارشی. مطالعات برنامه درسی آموزش عالی، 15، 134-113.
اعتمادی، حسین و نیک خواه آزاد، علی (1377). شناسایی عوامل و موانع رشد آموزش حسابداری در ایران و ارائه برنامه کارا و کارآمد. مدرس علوم انسانی، 6، 121-102.
بدری، احمد (1372). رویکرد فلسفی در آموزش حسابداری. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 2(6 و 7)، 23-5.
ثقفی، علی و محمدزاده نوین، عادل (1371). اعتلاء آموزش حسابداری در کشورهای در حال رشد: بررسی موردی ایران. (رمضانعلی رویایی: مترجم). بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 1(2)، 90-80.
درگاهی، حسین؛ حموزاده، پژمان؛ صادقی‌فر، جمیل؛ رعد آبادی، مهدی؛ روشنی، محمد؛ سلیمی، محمد و سلطان‌زاده، پریناز. (1389). ارزیابی معیارهای یک استاد توانمند برای تدریس اثربخش از دیدگاه دانشجویان پیراپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران. پیاورد سلامت، 4(3 و 4)، 98-91.
ساعی، محمدجواد؛ لاری دشت‌بیاض، محمود و فاتح گوش، حسین (1394). بررسی و تحلیل محتوای تحقیقات علمی- پژوهشی حسابرسی در دو دهه اخیر. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 22(3)، 220-203.
سیف، علی اکبر (1392). روانشناسی پرورشی نوین: روانشناسی یادگیری و آموزش. (ویرایش هفتم). تهران، ایران: نشر دوران.
شعبانی، حسن (1385). مهارت‌های آموزشی: روش‌ها و فنون تدریس. (چاپ سوم). تهران، ایران: انتشارات سمت.
شیربگی، ناصر (1392). تحلیلی بر منابع سوگیری و خطا در ارزشیابی دانشجویان از اثربخشی تدریس استادان. نامه آموزش عالی، 6(22)، 24-7.
عزیزی خالخیلی، طاهر؛ حسین پور، ابوطالب. (1395). عوامل مؤثر روی کیفیت تدریس اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری از دیدگاه دانشجویان و دانش‌آموختگان. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، 12(1)، 179-165.
مجتهدزاده، ویدا؛ علوی طبری، سیدحسین و مرادی پر، فاطمه (1389). دانش و مهارتهای مورد نیاز برای دانش‌آموختگان مقطع کارشناسی حسابداری: دیدگاه استادان دانشگاه، شاغلان در حرفه و دانشجویان حسابداری (بررسی موردی: استان آذربایجان غربی). مجله دانش حسابداری، 1(1)، 88-73.
مشایخی، بیتا؛ شفیع‌پور، سید مجتبی. (1391). بررسی کارایی نظام آموزشی رشته حسابداری در سطح دانشگاه‌های ایران با استفاده از تکنیک تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 19(67)، 142-119.
نوروش، ایرج (1382). بررسی فرایند تغییر برنامه درسی و پیشنهاد یک برنامه درسی نوسازی شده برای دوره کارشناسی رشته حسابداری. بررسی­های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 10(32)، 42-21.
نوروش، ایرج و مشایخی، بیتا (1384). نیازها و اولویت‌های آموزش حسابداری مدیریت: فاصله ادراکی بین دانشگاهیان و شاغلین در حرفه حسابداری. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 12(41)، 161-133.
References
Accounting Education Change Commission. (1990). AECC Urges Priority for Teaching in Higher Education. Issues Statement No. 1. Retrieved from: http://www2. aaahq.org/aecc/PositionsandIssues/issues1. Pdf.
Accounting Education Change Commission. (1993). Evaluating and Rewarding Effective Teaching. Issues Statement No. 5. Retrieved from: http://www2. aaahq.org/ AECC/pdf/position/issues5. Pdf.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2015). Sample Teaching Strategies and Techniques for Accounting Courses. Retrieved from:https://www.aicpa.org/interestareas/accountingeducation/resources/pages/ sample-teaching-strategies.aspx.
Aregbeyen, O. (2010). Students perceptions of effective teaching and effective lecturer characteristics at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 62-69.
Asadian, S., Piri, M., & SaadatFar, R. (2017). Effective teaching in higher education based on professional experiences of professors and its relationship with self-reported teaching. Journal of higher education curriculum studies, 8(15), 113-134 [In Persian].
Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. (1993) .Guidelines for effective university teaching. Canberra, Australia.
Azizi, T., & Hosseinpour, A. (2016). Factors affecting teaching quality of faculty members in sari agricultural sciences and natural resources university from students’ and graduates’ perspective. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 12(1), 163-179 [In Persian].
Badri, A. (1993). Philosophical Approach in Accounting Education. Accounting and Auditing Review, 2(6 & 7), 5-23 [In Persian].
Becher, T. (1984). The cultural view, in B.R. Clark (ed.). Perspectives on Higher Education, Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 165–198.
Becher, T. (1987). The disciplinary shaping of the profession, in B.R. Clark (ed.). The Academic Profession, Berkeley, University of California Press, 271–303.
Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57 (3), 204–213.
Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Casey, R.J., Gentile, P., & Bigger, S.W. (1997). Teaching appraisal in higher education: An Australian perspective. Higher Education, 34, 549-482.
Dargahi, H., Hamouzadeh, P., Sadeghifar, J., Raadabadi, M., Roshani, M., Salimi, M., & Soltanzadeh, P. (2010). Criteria assessment of a expect teacher for effective teaching. Journal of Payavard Salamat, 4(3-4), 91-98 [In Persian].
Delaney, J.G., Johnson, A.N., Johnson, T.D., & Treslan, D.L. (2010). Students' perceptions of effective teaching in higher education. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Distance Education and Learning Technologies.
Etemadi, H., & Nikkhah-Azad, A. (1998). Identify the factors and obstacles to the growth of accounting education in Iran and provide an effective and efficient program. Human Sciences Modares, 6, 102-121 [In Persian].
Green, T.F. (1964). A topology of the teaching concept. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 3(4), 284-319.
Gurney, P. (2007). Five Factors for Effective Teaching. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 4(2), 89-98.
Harden, R.M., & Crosby, J. (2000). AMEE Guide no 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer-the twele roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 334-347.
International Federation of Accountants. (2019). Handbook of international education pronouncements. New York, USA.
Ismail, S., Jamaludin, N., Zakaria, W.Z.W., & Nawi, N.M., (2017). A study on the accounting students’ perceptions towards teaching quality at university. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business, 2(5), 85-98.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Krishnan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper, published online.
Madsen, P.E. (2015). Has the quality of accounting education declined? The Accounting Review, 90(3), 1115-1147.
Mashayekhi, B., & Shafi Poor, S.M. (2012). Investigation of accounting education system efficiency in Iranian universities. Accounting and Auditing Review, 19(67), 119-142 [In Persian].
Mohidin, R., Jaidi, J., Lim, T.S., & Osman, Z. (2009). Effective teaching methods and lecturer characteristics a study on accounting students at Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS). European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 21-29.
Mojtahedzadeh, V., Alavi Tabari, S.H., & Moradi Par, F. (2010). Required knowledge and skills for accounting graduates (Case study: West Azerbaijan). Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 1(1), 73-88 [In Persian].
Moses, I. (1990). Teaching, research and scholarship in different disciplines. Higher Education, 19(3), 351-375.
Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135-146.
Noravesh, I. (2003). Review the process of changing the curriculum and suggest a renovated curriculum for an undergraduate degree in accounting discipline. Accounting and Auditing Review, 10(32), 21-42 [In Persian].
Noravesh, I., & Mashayekhi, B. (2005). Needs and priorities of management accounting training: The perceptual gap between academics and practitioners in the accounting profession. Accounting and Auditing Review, 12(41), 133-161 [In Persian].
Pathways Commission. (2012). The pathways commission on higher education: charting a national strategy for the next generation of accountants. Retrieved from: http://www.pathwayscommission.org.
Pierre, K.S., Wilson, R.M.S., Ravenscroft, S.P., & Rebele, J.E. (2009). The role of accounting education research in our discipline. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(2), 123-130.
Polk, J.A. (2006). Traits of effective teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), 23-29.
Quinn, F. M., & Hughes, S. J. (2007). Quinn’s principles and practice of Nurse Education (Fifth Edition). United Kingdom: Cengage Learning.
Raina, N. (2015). Effective teaching-learning strategies and quality of higher education in India: Some reflections. Journal of Commerce and Management Thought, 6(4), 669-683.
Rajeevan, S. (2020). Accounting: The teaching, the practice and what is missing. Vilakshan - XIMB Journal of Management, 17(1/2) 15-37.
Ramsden, P. (2004). Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Saei, M.J., Lari Dashtbayaz, M., & Fateh Goush, H. (2015). A review and content analyzing of Iranian auditing research: Two recent decades. The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, 22(2), 203-220 [In Persian].
Saif, A.A. (2013). Modern educational psychology: Psychology of learning and instruction. Tehran, Iran: Douran publication [In Persian].
Saqafi, A., & Mohammadzadeh-Novin, A. (1992). Promoting accounting education in developing countries: Case of Iran. Accounting and Auditing Review, 1(2), 80-90 [In Persian].
Scheerens, J. (2016). Defining the key factors in instructional effectiveness (Chapter 3). Educational effectiveness and Ineffectiveness (51-76). Springer Netherlands.
Shabani, H. (2006). Educational Skills: Teaching Methods and Techniques. Tehran, Iran: Samt publication [In Persian].
Sherman, T.M., Armistead, L.P., Fowler, F., Barksdale, M.A., & Reif, G. (1987). The quest for excelience in university teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 58(1), 66-84.
Shirbagi, N. (2013). An analysis of the sources of bias and error in students’ evaluation of teaching. Higher Education Letter, 6(22), 7-24 [In Persian].
Stice, J.D., & Stocks, K.D. (2000). Effective teaching techniques: Perceptions of accounting faculty. Advances in Accounting Education, 2, 179-191.
Stout, D.E., & Wygal, D.E. (2010). Negative behaviors that impede learning: Survey findings from award-winning accounting educators. Journal of Accounting Education, 28(2), 58-74.
Weeda, W.C. (1986). Effectiviteitsonderzoek van scholen. In: J.C. van der Wolf & J.J. Hox (red.). Kwaliteit van het onderwijs in het geding [About education quality]. Publicaties van het Amsterdams Pedogogische Centrum, nr. 2. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Wygal, D.E., & Stout, D.E. (2015). Shining a light on effective teaching best practices: Survey findings from award-winning accounting educators. Issues in Accounting Education, 30(3), 173-205.
Wygal, D.E., Watty, K., & Stout, D.E. (2014). Drivers of teaching effectiveness: Views from accounting educator exemplars in Australia. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 23(4), 322-342.
Young, S., & Shaw, D.G. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers. Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 670-686.
Zhou, H., Liu, M., Zeng, J., & Zhu, J. (2016). Selection of nursing teaching strategies in mainland China: A questionnaire survey. Nurse Education Today, 1(39), 147-151.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 December 2021
  • Revise Date: 12 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 16 February 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics