Organizational Complexity and Audit Report Lag: Meta-Analysis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Accounting, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

2 M.A. of Accounting, university of Qom, Qom, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2021.18232.3575

Abstract

Objective: Due to the expansion of societies and economic and commercial issues, the demand for financial and economic information has increased and the financial statements of companies that contain this information are of great importance to users. This information is effective on people's decisions when it is reported at the right time, otherwise some of them lose their economic value. The timely submission of financial statements depends on the completion period of the audit process, as financial statements cannot be released before the audit is completed. The duration of annual audit is stated as one of the most important factors determining the timeliness of financial reporting of companies. The delay in submitting the audit report reduces the credibility and quality of financial reporting. According to previous researches, the timely presentation of financial reports enriches the content of information, which affects the value of the company. Considering that the reporting of financial information is delayed until it is not audited by independent auditors, the auditing of financial statements by external independent auditors is very important, because audited financial statements are considered to be the most important reliable sources for investors and their users. It can be said that financial statements audited by external independent auditors are the only and best source for external users. The issue of delay in providing the audit report is significant and vital for external users because faster access to information is effective in their optimal decision-making and also increases the possibility of earning profit. The purpose of this study is to apply a meta-analysis approach to combine and analyze contradictory findings from various studies to investigate the effect of characteristics and accounting complexity criteria of the company on the audit report lag.
 Methods: The current research is applied research in terms of classification based on the goal, and descriptive-meta-analytical in terms of nature and method. Meta-analysis is a research approach that helps the researcher to achieve a suitable combination of the quantitative results of contradictory and non-contradictory studies in the past, to explain the contradictions and to identify the structural variables that moderate the results of the past studies. Meta-analysis basically follows the steps of a scientific research and has almost the same steps as quantitative research, with the difference that here the sampling unit is a study instead of a subject, and because it is actually a combination of data from several studies to produce a single estimate, therefore, from a statistical point of view, It is considered a type of multi-factorial method. The community under investigation of this research is internationally published authoritative articles (A*, A, B, C) in the list of 2019 (ABDC) and domestic authoritative articles approved by the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. In order to achieve the purpose of the research using Lipsey & Wilson (2001) method and also Cochran’s Q test and Egger test, a total of 77 studies including 20 internal studies during 2010 Up to 2019 and 57 foreign studies during the years 1989 to 2019 were reviewed. In these researches audit report lag was considered as a dependent variable and the characteristics of the Organizational complexity as an independent variable. CMA2 software is used in meta-analysis in order to perform the necessary calculations, including calculating the effect size, after collecting the desired variables from the relevant research.
 Results: The results of this study shows that there is a negative relationship between the firm size and the audit report lag, while other characteristics, extraordinary items, subsidiary, merger or acquisition, foreign sales, restatement of financial statements and Business segments of the company have a positive relationship with the audit report lag.
 Conclusion: Considering the expansion of accounting and auditing knowledge and the importance of providing timely information for financial and economic decisions, the factors that cause delays in the submission of audit reports and ultimately audited financial statements are very important. The delay in submitting the audit report causes an imbalance in the level of access of users to financial information, which can ultimately affect the capital market transactions and the value of the company. The conclusion of the present meta-analysis showed that one of the complexity criteria used in most studies is the size of the company. Larger companies, with more resources and facilities, seek for faster auditing and reduce delays in the audit report. It can also be stated that the existence of other criteria related to the complexity of the company will lead to the expansion of the audit process and increase the delay in submitting the audit report.

Keywords

References

بذرافشان، آمنه (1392). روش شناسی متاآنالیز (فراتحلیل) در حسابداری: معرفی، ضرورت‌ها و کاربردها. وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری. ارائه شده در یازدهمین دوره همایش حسابداری ایران، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد.
برزیده، فرخ و معیری، مرتضی (1386). عوامل موثر بر به موقع بودن گزارش حسابرسی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 4(16)، 69-43.
بهمن‌آبادی، مرضیه (۱۳۹۰). عوامل مؤثر بر تأخیر حسابرسی صورت‌های مالی پایان دوره در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران.
بیات، علی و علی احمدی، سعید (1393). تأخیر حسابرسی و به موقع بودن گزارشگری مالی. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی وحسابرسی، 6(22)، 121-97.
پورحیدری، امید؛ برهانی‌نژاد، سعیده و محمدرضاخانی، وحید. (1394). بررسی تاثیر کیفیت حسابرسی بر به موقع بودن گزارش حسابرسی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. نشریه دانش حسابرسی، 14(58)، 104-85.
حبیبی، سلماز؛ ابزری، مهدی و فتحی، سعید (1393). فراتحلیل عوامل تعیین کننده ساختار سرمایه در سطح شرکت. نشریه مدیریت دارایی و تامین مالی، 2(1)، 74-55.
حیدری کردزنگنه، غلامرضا و عالی پور، زهره (1386). مهندسی فرهنگ خصوصی سازی. تهران، پندارفارس.
زارع بهنمیری، محمد جواد وحسنخانی، فاطمه (1400). ویژگی‌های مؤسسه حسابرسی و تأخیر ارائه گزارش حسابرسی با رویکرد فراتحلیل. بررسی‏‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 28(4)، 690-664.
صالحی، الله کرم؛ بزرگمهریان، شاهرخ و جنت مکان، حسین (1396). بررسی تاثیر پیچیدگی اطلاعات حسابداری بر تاخیر ارائه صورت های مالی حسابرسی شده و عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی با تاکید بر نقش کیفیت حسابرسی. دانش حسابداری مالی، 4(3)، 116-87.
عربی، مهدی و حسن پور، شیوا (1393). رابطه بین ویژگیهای هیات مدیره و زمان بندی گزارشگری مالی. دانش حسابداری مالی، 1(3)، 124-107.
لاری‌دشت بیاض، محمود؛ قناد، مصطفی و فکور، حسین (1397). ویژگی‌های کمیته حسابرسی و تأخیر در گزارش حسابرسی. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی وحسابرسی، 10(37)، 242-215.
لاری‌دشت بیاض، محمود؛ محمدی، شعبان؛ نقش‌بندی، نادر و معین‌نژاد، بهراد (1397). تأثیر مکانیسم‌های حاکمیت شرکتی و ویژگی‌های مرتبط با حسابرسی بر افشای به موقع. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری، 8(4)، 298-273.
مران‌‌جوری، حسین؛ رضوانی، جهانگیر (۱۳۹۷). فراتحلیل در تحقیقات حسابداری. فصلنامه پژوهش حسابداری، 8(2)، 147-125.
مهدوی، غلامحسین و جمالیان پور، مظفر (1389). بررسی عوامل موثر بر سرعت گزارشگری مالی شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی، 2(4)، 108-89.
واعظ، ‌سید‌علی؛ عابدی‌صدقیانی، ‌بابک و احمدی، ‌وریا (۱۳۹۵). بررسی ارتباط بین برخی شاخص‌های کیفی حسابرسی و ویژگی‌های شرکت با تأخیر در ارائه گزارش حسابرسی. نشریه دانش حسابرسی، 16(62)، 120-101.
References
Abbott, L.J., Parker, S., & Peters, G.F. (2012). Internal audit assistance and external audit timeliness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 3-20.
Abernathy, J.L., Kubick, T.R., & Masli, A. (2018). Evidence on the relation between managerial ability and financial reporting timeliness. International Journal of Auditing, 22(2), 185-196.
Abdillah, M.R., Mardijuwono, A.W., & Habiburrochman, H. (2019). The effect of company characteristics and auditor characteristics to audit report lag. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 129-144.
Abidin, Sh. Ahmad-Zaluki, N. (2012). Auditor Industry Specialism and Reporting Timeliness. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 65, 873-878.
Afify, H. A. E. (2009). Determinants of audit report lag: Does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 56–86.
Al-Ajmi, J. (2008). Audit and reporting delays: Evidence from an emerging market. Advances in Accounting, 24(2), 217-226.
Arabi, M., & Hassanpour, S. (2015). The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Timing of Financial Reporting. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 1(3), 107-124 [In Persian].
Ashton, R. H., Graul, P. R., & Newton, J. D. (1989). Audit delay and the timeliness of corporate reporting. Contemporary accounting research, 5(2), 657-673.
Ashton, R.H., Willingham, J.J., & Elliott R.K. (1987). An empirical analysis of audit delay. Journal of Accounting Research, 25(2), 275-292.
Asthana, S. (2014). Abnormal audit delays, earnings quality and firm value in the USA. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 12(1), 21–44.
Baatwah, S.R., Salleh, Z., & Stewart, J. (2019). Audit committee chair accounting expertise and audit report timeliness. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(2), 273-306.
Bahmanabadi, M. (2011). The factors effecting on audit delay of the financial statements on Tehran stock Exchange Companies. Master Thesis of Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran [In Persian].
Bamber, E. M., Bamber, L. S., & Schoderbek, M. P. (1993). Audit structure and other determinants of audit report lag: An empirical analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12(1), 1–23.
Barzideh, F., & Moayeri, M. (2006). The effective factors on timeliness of audit report: Evidence from Iran. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 4(16), 43-69 [In Persian].
Blankley, A. I., Hurtt, D. N., & MacGregor, J. E. (2014). The relationship between audit report lags and future restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(2), 27-57.
Bayat, A., Ali Ahmadi, S. (2013). Audit delay and timeliness of financial reporting. Journal of Financial Accounting and Audit Research , 6(22), 121-97 [In Persian].
Bazarafshan, A. (2012). Methodology of meta-analysis in accounting: introduction, necessities and applications. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Presented at the 11th Iran Accounting Conference, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad [In Persian].
Carslaw, C., & Kaplan, S. E. (1991). An Examination Further Evidence of Audit Delay: from New Zealand. Accounting and Business Research, 22(85), 21-32.
Chan, K. H., Luo, V. W., & Mo, P. L. (2016). Determinants and implications of long audit reporting lags: evidence from China. Accounting and Business Research, 46(2), 145-166.
Dao, M., & Pham, T. (2014). Audit tenure, auditor specialization and audit report lag. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(6), 490-512.
Durand, G. (2018), The determinants of audit report lag: a meta-analysis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(1), 44-75.
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj, 315(7109), 629-634.
Farag, M. (2017). The impact of accelerated filing requirements on meeting audit report deadlines. Accounting Research Journal, 30(1), 58–72.
Ghafran, C., & Yasmin, S. (2018). Audit committee chair and financial reporting timeliness: A focus on financial, experiential and monitoring expertise. International Journal of Auditing, 22(1), 13-24.
Habib, A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2011). Audit firm industry specialization and the audit report lag. Journal of international accounting, auditing and taxation, 20(1), 32-44.
Habibi, S., Abzari, M., & Fathi, S. (2014). Determinants of Capital Structure: Meta-analysis. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 2(1), 55-74 [In Persian].
Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). The impact of demographic characteristics of CEOs and directors on audit fees and audit delay. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(8–9), 963–997.
Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141-191.
Hennes, K. M., Leone, A. J., & Miller, B. P. (2008). The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1487–1519.
Heydari Kordzanganeh, G., & Aalipour, Z. (2006). Privatization culture engineering. Tehran, Pendar Fars [In Persian].
Hribar, P., & Jenkins, N. T. (2004). The effect of accounting restatements on earnings revisions and the estimated cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(2–3), 337–356.
Jaggi, B., & Tsui, J. (1999). Determinants of audit report lag: Further evidence from Hong Kong. Accounting and business research, 30(1), 17-28.
Kim, J. H. (2019). The Impact of Asymmetric Cost Behavior on the Audit Report Lag. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(4), 1-13.
Knechel, W. R., & Sharma, D. S. (2012). Auditor-provided nonaudit services and audit effectiveness and efficiency: Evidence from pre-and post-SOX audit report lags. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 85-114.
Lari dashtebayaz, M., Ghannad, M., & Fakour, H. (2018). Features of the Audit committee and the Delay in the Audit report. The Financial Accounting & Auditing Researches, 10(37), 215-241 [In Persian].
Lari dashtebayaz, M., Mohammadi, S., Naghshbandi, N., & Moeinnezhad, B. (2018). Effects of Audit-related Features and Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Timely Disclosure. Empirical Research in Accounting, 8(4), 273-298 [In Persian].
Lee, H. Y., Mande, V., & Son, M. (2008). A comparison of reporting lags of multinational and domestic firms. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 19(1), 28-56.
Leventis, S., Weetman, P., & Caramanis, C. (2005). Determinants of audit report lag: Some evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange. International Journal of Auditing, 9(1), 45-58.
Lipsey, W., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Macaskill P, Walter Sd, Irwing LA. (2000). Comparison of methods to detect publication biasd in meta-analysis. State Med, 20, 641-654.
Mahdavi, G., & Jamalian Pour, M. (2011). Effective Factors on Speed of Financial Reporting in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 2(4), 89-108 [In Persian].
Mao, M. Q., & Yu, Y. (2015). Analysts' cash flow forecasts, audit effort, and audit opinions on internal control. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(5-6), 635-664.
Maranjory, M. (2018). Meta-Analysis in Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Research, 8(2), 125-147[In Persian].
Mitra, S., Song, H., & Yang, J. S. (2015). The effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on audit report lags. Accounting Horizons, 29(3), 507-527.
MohammadRezaei, F., & Mohd‐Saleh, N. (2018). Audit report lag: the role of auditor type and increased competition in the audit market. Accounting & Finance, 58(3), 885-920.
Ng, P. P., & Tai, B. Y. (1994). An empirical examination of the determinants of audit delay in Hong Kong. The British Accounting Review, 26(1), 43-59.
Oussii, A. A., & Taktak, N. B. (2018). Audit committee effectiveness and financial reporting timeliness. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 9 (1), 34-55.
Owusu-Ansah, S. (2000). Timeliness of corporate financial reporting in emerging capital markets:  Empirical evidence from the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange. Accounting and business research, 30(3), 241-254.
Palmrose, Z.-V., Richardson, V. J., & Scholz, S. (2004). Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 59–89.
Pourheidari, O., Borhaninejad, S., & Mohammad Reza Khani, V. (2015). The effect of audit quality on the timeliness of audit reports in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Audit Science, 14(58), 85-104 [In Persian].
Salehi, A., Bozorgmehriyan, S., & Janatmakan, H. (2018). Complexity of accounting information on delay the audited financial statements and information asymmetry with emphasis on the role of audit quality, Journal of Empirical Reasearch Of Financial Accounting, 4(3), 87-116 [In Persian].
Sharma, V. D. & Iselin, E. R, (2012), The Association between Audit Committee Multiple-Directorships, Tenure, and Financial Misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(3), 149–175.
Sharma, D. S., Tanyi, P. N., & Litt, B. A. (2017). Costs of mandatory periodic audit partner rotation: Evidence from audit fees and audit timeliness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(1), 129-149.
Vaez, A., Abedi Sadeghiani, B., & Ahmadi, V. (2016). The relationship between some audit quality indicators and company characteristics with Audit Report Lag. Journal of Audit Science, 16(62), 101-120 [In Persian].
Woo, E.‐S., & Koh, H. C. (2001). Factors associated with auditor changes: A Singapore study. Accounting and Business Research, 31(2), 133–144.
Zare Bahnamiri, M. J., & Hasankhani, F. (2021). Auditor Characteristics and Audit Report Lag: A Meta-Analysis. Accounting and Auditing Review, 28(4), 664-690 [In Persian].
Journal of Accounting Knowledge
Volume 13, Issue 4 - Serial Number 51
December 2022
Pages 161-177

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 September 2021
  • Revise Date: 28 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 14 December 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics