Tax Avoidance: Social Responsibility and the Moderator Role of Family Ownership

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Accounting, Payame Noor, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2021.16700.3359

Abstract

Purpose : The company's most important goal is to maximize shareholder wealth, so balancing social goals with economic concerns (tax costs), which can reduce shareholder wealth, has become an important issue in academic research in recent years, Which has led to the development of a literature on social responsibility and tax avoidance. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of social responsibility and family ownership on tax avoidance according to the framework of agency theory and stakeholder theory.  It also examines the role of family ownership in the relationship between social responsibility and tax avoidance. Methods: In order to test the research hypotheses, 75 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2011 to 2019 were examined. To test the research hypotheses, multivariate regression with a combined data model was used. Results: The results show that corporate social responsibility has a negative and significant relationship with tax avoidance. Nor does family ownership regulate the relationship between social responsibility and tax avoidance.. Conclusion: The existence of corporate social responsibility reduced tax avoidance in the companies under study. The results of this section are consistent with Freeman (1984) Stakeholder Theory, which believes in a two-way relationship between companies and stakeholders. On the one hand, companies must create value for their stakeholders, and since the payment of taxes by companies is in the public interest. Companies that engage in social responsibility activities have not paid their share of taxes and are less inclined to avoid taxes. On the other hand, social responsibility activity is a kind of productive investment and helps to attract investors and in the long run will improve the performance and upgrade the social base of companies. Therefore, it can be said that socially responsible companies will improve their financial performance in the future by paying taxes now.Family ownership was an overlap with social responsibility, but its interaction with social responsibility did not strengthen the link between social responsibility and tax avoidance. The reason for rejecting the second hypothesis can be argued that family-owned companies do not take risks because of their last name, and consider the company's name and reputation as a legacy to be passed on to their children. So, in fact, the concept of reputation has created the overlap of family ownership with social responsibility; therefore, its interaction with the social responsibility variable has not strengthened the relationship between social responsibility and tax avoidance.

Keywords

References

ایراندوست، عبدالله؛ قوامی پور، محسن؛ ابراهیم نژاد، روح‌الله؛ حسین‌پور، داوود. (1392). عوامل کلیدی اثرگذار بر موفقیت کسب وکارهای خانوادگی اولویت‌بندی با روش تحلیل شبکه‌ای.  توسعه کارآفرینی، 6(2)، 20-7.
بنی‌فاطمه، حسین؛ نوذری،حمزه؛ محمدی تلوار، ستار. (1396). بررسی جامعه‌شناختی چالش‌های رشد و توسعه بنگاه‌های اقتصادی خانوادگی در ایران (موردمطالعه: بنگاه‌های اقتصادی کوچک و متوسط شهر تهران). جامعه‌شناسی اقتصادی و توسعه، 6(1)، 83-70.
بهارمقدم، مهدی؛ امین‌نیا، میثم. (1393). بررسی رابطه بین تمرکز مالکیت و جسورانه بودن مالیات. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی ، 6(4)، 36-23.
پورحیدری، امید؛ سروستانی، امیر. (1392). شناسایی و تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر مدیریت مالیات. مجله دانش حسابداری، 4(12)، 110-89.
پورحیدری، امید؛ فدوی، محمدحسن؛ امینی‌نیا، میثم. (1393). بررسی تأثیر اجتناب از پرداخت مالیات بر شفافیت گزارشگری مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، 14(52)، 85-69.
پورمقیم، سیدجواد؛ نعمت‌پور، معصومه و موسوی میرحسین. (1384). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر سطح وصول درآمدهای مالیاتی در سیستم مالیاتی ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، 5(2)، 188-161.
حاجیان‌نژاد، امین؛ دانش سرارودی، سید رسول. (1398). بررسی تأثیر هزینه نمایندگی و نقدشوندگی بر اجتناب مالیاتی از طریق سودآوری. مجله دانش حسابداری، 10(1)، 136-115.
حجازی، رضوان؛ ابوحمزه، مینا. (1394). مسئولیت اجتماعی و تمکین مالیاتی شرکتی (مطالعه موردی اداره کل امور مالیاتی مؤدیان بزرگ). دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 4(16)، 90-77.
حساس یگانه، یحیی؛ رضایی، شهروز. (1397). مدلی برای تأثیر مسئولیت اجتماعی و هزینه های مدیریت مالیات شرکت براجتناب و فرار مالیاتی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 15(85)، 58-27.
دارابی، رؤیا؛ پاشانژاد، یوسف؛ تدین‌فرد، اسماعیل. (1396). بررسی رابطة بین مسئولیت اجتماعی، عملکرد اقتصادی و اجتناب از مالیات شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. بررسی‌های حسابداری، 4(15)، 92-67.
عزیزی، شهریار. (1392). متغیرهای میانجی، تعدیل‌گر و مداخله‌گر در پژوهش‌های بازاریابی: مفهوم، تفاوت‌ها، آزمون‌ها و رویه‌های آماری. تحقیقات بازاریابی نوین، 3(2)، 176-157.
محمدرضائی، فخرالدین؛ گل‌چهره، محمد. (1396). خطای حسابرسی، نوع گزارش و تعداد بندهای شرط حسابرسی: نقش مشغلۀکاری شرکای مؤسسات حسابرسی. حسابداری مالی، 9(36)، 31-1.
مشایخی، بیتا؛ سیدی، سید جلال. (1394) راهبری شرکتی و اجتناب مالیاتی. مجله دانش حسابداری، 6(20)، 103-83.
References
Asian, A., Uche, T. (2018). Corporate tax and corporate social responsibility of firms in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(10), 121-142.
Baharmoghadam.,M, Amininia.,M .(2015). An Investigation of the Relationship between Ownership Concentration and Tax Aggressiveness, Journal of Financial Accounting Research,6(4),23-36 [In Persian].
Ball, R., Jayaraman, S., Shivakumar, L. (2012). Audited financial reporting and voluntary disclosure as complements: A test of the confirmation hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 136–66.
Bani Fatemeh,H., Mohammadi Talvar,S., Nozari,H. (2017). Sociological study of the challenges of growth and development of family businesses in Iran (Case study: small and medium enterprises in Tehran), Journal of Economics & Development Sociology, 6(1),1-34 [In Persian].
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gómez Mejía, L.R., Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.
Carrol, A.B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q. (2008). Do family firms provide more or less voluntary disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 499–536.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non financial firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.
Cruz, C., Larraza Kintana, M., Garcés Galdeano, L., Berrone, P. (2014). Are family firms really more socially responsible? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1295–1316.
Darabi, R., Pashanjad, Y., Tadinafard,I.(2017). Examination of the Relationship between Social Responsibility,Economic Performance and Tax Avoidance in Companies Listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Accounting Reviews,4(15),67-92 [In Persian].
Fama, E.F., Jenses, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A., Sever, J.M. (2000). The reputation quotient SM: A multi stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–255.
Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A., Sever, J.M. (2000). The reputation quotient SM: A multi stakeholder measure
Freeman, R., Reed, D. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman Publishing Inc.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13th September 1970.
Godfrey, P.C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.
González, E.L., Ferrero, J.M Meca, E.G. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental, 26(4),819-831
Hajiannejad, A., Danesh Sararoudi, S.R .(2019). Effects of agency cost and liquidity on tax avoidance by the use of profitability. Journal of Accounting Knowledge,10(36), 115-136 [In Persian].
Hasas Yeghaneh,Y., Rezaei, SH. (2018). A model for impact of corporate social responsibility and tax management costs on avoidance and tax evasion.  Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 15(58), 27-58 [In Persian].
Hasseldine, J., Morris, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: A comment and reflection. Accounting Forum, 37, 1-14.
Hejazi, R., Abu Hamza, M. (2016). Social responsibility and corporate tax compliance (A case study of large taxpayers units). Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 4(16), 77-90 [In Persian].
Hill, C.W., Jones, T.M. (1992). Stakeholder agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.
Hoi, C.K., Wu, Q., Zhang, K. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2025–2059.
Irandust, A., ghavamipour, M., Ebrahimnejhad , R., Hoseinpour. D. (2013). Key factors affecting the success of family businesses in Iran and prioritization, Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 6(2),55-74 [In Persian].
Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior: Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kuo. Y., Yi-Mien, L., Hsiu-Fang C. (2020). Corporate Social responsibility, enterprise risk management, and real earnings management: Evidence from Managerial Confidence. Finance Research Letters.
Laguir, I., Staglianò, R., Elbaz, J. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness? Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 662–675.
Landry, S., Deslandes, M., Fortin, A. (2013). Tax aggressiveness, corporate social responsibility and ownership structure. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, 14(3), 611-645.
Le Breton Miller, I., Miller, D., Bares, F. (2015). Governance and entrepreneurship in family firms: Agency, behavioral agency and resourcebased comparisons. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(1), 58–62.
Lee, M.D.P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73.
Lin, K.Z., Cheng, S., Zhang, F. (2017). Corporate social responsibility, institutional environments, and tax avoidance: Evidence from a subnational comparison in China. The International Journal of Accounting, 52(4), 303–318.
Mahon, J.F. (2002). Corporate reputation: A research agenda using strategy and stakeholder’s literature. Business & Society, 21(4), 415–444.
Mashaykhi, B., Seyyedi, S.J. (2015). Corporate Governance and Tax Avoidance, Journal of Accounting Knowledge,6(20),83-103 [In Persian].
Mgbame, C., Chijoke, M., Yekini, S., Yekini, C. (2017). Corporate social responsibility performance and tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 9(8), 101-108.
Miller, D., Le Breton Miller, I., Lester, R.H., Canella, A.A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858.
MohammadRezaei, F., Mohammad ,G.CH. (2018). Audit failure, audit opinion and auditor’s remarks: The role of audit partner busyness. Quarterly Financial Accounting Journal, 9(36), 1-31 [In Persian].
Mozaffar, Kh., Suraj, S., Liang ,T. (2017). Institutional ownership and corporate tax avoidance: New evidence. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 101-122.
of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–255.
Oha, W.Y., Changc, Y.K., Jung, R. (2019). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: Does family involvement in management matter? Journal of Business Research, 103, 23–33.
Petersen, M.A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435-480.
Pourheidari, O., Fadavi, M.H., Aminiya, M.(2014). An investigation on the effect of tax avoidance on the transparency of financial reporting firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Economic Research, 14(52),85-69 [In Persian].
Pourheidari, O., Sarvestani, A.(2013). Identifying and explaining the effective factors on the tax management. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 4(12).89-110 [In Persian].
Pourmoghim, S.J., Nematopour, M., Mousavi M.H. (2005). Investigating the factors affecting the level of tax revenue collection in the Iranian tax system, Journal of Economic Research,5(17),161-187 [In Persian].
Preuss, L. (2010). Tax avoidance and corporate social responsibility: You cannot do both, or can you? Corporate Governance, 10(4), 365–374.
Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490.
Shahriar., A. (2013). Mediator, moderator and intervening variables in marketing researchs: Conceptualization, differences and statistical procedures and tests. New Marketing Research Journal, 3(2), 176-157 [In Persian].
Sikka, P. (2010). Smoke and mirrors: Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance—A reply to Hasseldine and Morris. Accounting Forum, 37(1), 15–38.
Singla, C., Veliyath, R., George, R. (2014). Family firms and internationalization governance relationships: Evidence of secondary agency issues. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 606–616.
Steijvers, T., Niskanen, M. (2014). Tax aggressiveness in private family firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(4), 335–396
Wang, G.Y. (2010). The impacts of free cash flows and agency costs on firm performance. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3, 408-418.
Journal of Accounting Knowledge
Volume 12, Issue 3 - Serial Number 46
December 2021
Pages 111-128

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 November 2020
  • Revise Date: 11 February 2021
  • Accept Date: 25 May 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics