The Impact of Machiavellianism Behavior on Auditor Professional Skepticism: A Test of Personality Psychology Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D Student of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2021.14582.3059

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the behavioral characteristics of opportunism (Machiavellianism) on the skepticism of the profession of independent auditors as one of the important components of auditors in detecting significant fraud and distortion in the financial statements. Which can have a negative impact on the judgment and decision of auditors.
Methods: This research is an applied research and is one of the descriptive survey research. Required data were collected and analyzed using a questionnaire completed by 466 auditors from the members of Iranian Association of Certified Public, Audit Office, and the Supreme Audit Court. Questionnaire questions consist of two parts, general and specific. The public sector questions include the general characteristics of the respondents including gender, place of employment, level of education, age and occupation. The following standard questionnaires were used for specific questions. 1. Behavioral Characteristics of Opportunism: Christie and Gais (1970) this questionnaire consists of 20 items. The items in this scale have 5 options including strongly disagree, disagree, disagree, agree and strongly agree, which are scored from 1 to 5, respectively. 2. Professional Doubt: Hart (2010) this questionnaire consists of 30 items with 6 components. The components of the questioner's mind are measured by 3 items, interruption in judgment by 5 items, knowledge search by 6 items, interpersonal perception by 5 items, self-confidence by 5 items, and self-judgment by 6 items. The items in this scale have 6 options completely disagree, disagree, slightly disagree, slightly agree, agree and strongly agree, which are scored from 1 to 6, respectively.
 
Results: he results of this study showed that the behavioral characteristics of opportunism have a significant and negative relationship with the skepticism of auditors. This means that as the level of opportunism in auditors increases, so does their professional skepticism. Other results of this study also indicate that opportunism has a significant and negative relationship with the skepticism of independent auditors. In other words, as the level of opportunism in auditors increases, so does the dimension of the questioning mind, the pause in judgment, the search for knowledge, interpersonal understanding, self-confidence, and self-judgment. The evidence of this research is consistent with the theoretical foundations of the research of Azjen (2005), Danley et al. (2003), Schaefer and Wang (2011), Gosh and Curtin (1996) and Beigi Herchgani et al. (2015). In their research, they concluded that personality-behavioral characteristics affect people's judgment and decision-making, and behavioral disorders, including opportunism, reduce the efficiency and performance of auditors.
 
Conclusion: The results of this study show that opportunistic behavioral characteristics in the skepticism of independent auditors reduce the desire and motivation of auditors to collect information and evidence, reduce the proof of management claims in financial statements, reduce independence and impartiality, reduce confidence and motivation of auditors and Decreased mentality and interest of independent auditors.. It is therefore recommended that auditors and supervisory bodies take ethics seriously and by establishing mechanisms that prevent unethical behavior, take an effective step towards improving the economic conditions of the country and thus protecting the public interest.

Keywords

References

اسفندیانی، محمد رحیم؛ محسنین، شهریار. (1396). معادلات ساختاری مبتنی بر رویکرد حدقل مربعات جزیی به کمک نرم‌افزار Smart PLS. تهران: انتشارات موسسه کتاب مهربان نشر.
آذر، عادل؛ غلامزاده، رسول. (1391). مدلسازی مسیری- ساختاری در مدیریت با نرم‌افزار Smart PLS، تهران: انتشارات نگاه دانش.
بیگی هرچگانی، ابراهیم؛ بنی‌مهد، بهمن؛ رئیس‌زاده، سید محمدرضا؛ رویایی، رمضانعلی. (1395). بررسی تأثیر ویژگی رفتاری فرصت‌طلبی بر هشدار دهی حسابرسان. حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، (1)2، 95-65.
داوری، علی؛ آرش، رضازاده. (1392). مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار PLS، تهران، انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
گل‌پرور، محسن؛ نادی، محمدعلی. (1389). ارزش‌های فرهنگی و انصاف: عدالت سازمانی، رضایت- شغلی و ترک خدمت. تحقیقات فرهنگی، (3)3، 28-7.
هومن، حیدرعلی. (1385). راهنمای علمی پژوهش کیفی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت).
غلامرضایی، محسن؛ حسنی، محمد. (1398) . تاثیر اختلالات شخصیت بر تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرسان مستقل . دانش حسابداری، 10(2) ، 76-43.
References
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Berkshire: Open University Press, 58(10), 252-270.
Ali, F., Amorim, I.S., Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences,47(6) , 758-762.
American Institute of Accountants CPA (AICPA). (2002). Exposure draft: Maintaining the relevance of the uniform CPA exam. Available at: https://www.Aicpa.org/press/ pressreleases/2015/pages/aicpa- exposure –draft – next . 86(2) , 465-497.
Austin, E.J., Farrelly, D., Black, C., Moore, H. (2007). Emotional ntelligence, EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5) , 179–189.
Azar, A., Gholamzadeh, R. (2012). Route modeling- structural management in smart PLS software. First Edition, Knowledge Publication ]In Persian].
Beigi Harchegani, E., Banimahd, B., Raiiszade, S.M.R., Royaee, R. (2017). The effect of auditors’ feature machiavellian behavior on their whistle blowing. Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accountings Achievements, 1(2), 65-95 ]In Persian].
Bell, T.B., Peecher, M.E., Solomon, I. (2005). The 21st century public company audit. KPMG's Global Audit Methodolog, .48(3), 112-131.
Bereczkei, T. (2015). The manipulative skill: Cognitive devices and their neural correlates underlying Machiavellian's decision making. Brain and Cognition, 99(2),24-31.
Brunell, A.B., Gentry, W.A., Campbell, W.K., Hoffman, B.J., Kuhnert, K.W., DeMarree, K.G. (2008). Leader emergence: The case of the narcissistic leader Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(28) , 1663–1676.
Calhoun, R.P. (1969). Niccoli Machiavelli and the twentieth century administrator. Academy of management Journal, 12, 205-212.
Christie, R., Geis, F.L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic Press.75 , 327-341.
Dahling, J., Whitaker , B., Levy, P. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219-257.
Davari, A., Rezazadeh, A. (2017). Modeling structural equations with PLS software. Fourth Edition, Jahad University Press ]In Persian].
Donnelly, D., Quirin, P., O’Bryan, J. (2003). Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior: An explanatory model using auditors’ personal characteristics. Behavioral Research in Accounting,15(1), 87–110.
Esfandiyani Rahim, M., Mohsenin, S. (2017). Structural equations based on partial squared equation approach using Smart PLS software, Second Edition, Mehaban Publishing Institute Publishing ]In Persian].
Fehr, B., Samson, D., Paulhus, D.L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. Spielberger, & J. Butcher (Eds.). Advances in Personality Assessment, 93, 77-116. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fogelin, R.J. (1994). Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Geis, F., Weinheimer, S., Berger, D. (1970). Playing legislature: Cool heads and hot issues. In R. Christie & F. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 190–209). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Gholamrezaei, Mohsen; Hassani, Mohammad. (1398). The effect of personality disorders on the professional skepticism of independent auditors. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 10 (2), 76-43 ]In Persian].
Ghosh, D., Crain, T. (1996). Experimental investigation of ethical standards and perceived probability of audit on intentional noncompliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 221-244.
Glover, S.M., Prawitt, D.F. (2014). Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional. Current Issues in Auditing, 76(2), 323-329.
Golparvar, M., Nadi, M. (2010). Cultural values and fairness: Organizational justice, job satisfaction and leaving work. Journal of Cultural Research, 3(3), 228-207 ]In Persian].
Hargis, M.B. (2006). A PxS perspective on perceptions of corporate transgressions: The influence of personality and account giving (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3211005).
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partical least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 227-320.
Hookway, C. (1990). Skepticism. New York, NY: Routledge.9(1) , 117-129.
Hooman, A. (2006). Scientific guide to qualitative research. Tehran: Organization for the study and compilation of humanities books of universities (side) ]In Persian].
Hurtt, K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 29(1), 149–171. doi:10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
Hurtt, R.K. Brown Liburd, H., Earley, C.E., Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(1), 45-97.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2012). Invitation to comment: Enhancing audit quality in the public interest: A focus on professional skepticism, quality control and group audits. Available at: http://www.ifac.org/ system/files/publications/files/IAASB-invitation to comment enhancing audit quality.pdf.
Jones, D.N., Paulhus, D.L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M.R. Leary & R.H. Hoyle (Eds.), Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 93–108). New York, NY: Guilford Press. 12, 204-221.
Mautz, P.K., Sharaf, H.A. (1961). The philosophy of auditing. American Auditing Association, Saratosa.77 (2) , 453-479.
McIlwain, D. (2003). Bypassing empathy: A Machiavellian theory of mind and sneaky power. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.). Individual Differences in Theory of Mind (pp. 39–66). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Nagler, U.K., Reiter, K.J., Furtner, M.R., Rauthmann, J.F. (2014). Is there a dark intelligence? Emotional intelligence is used by dark personalities to emotionally manipulate others. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 47–52.
Nolder, C., Kadous. K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract, 22(6), 372-393.
Olsen, C., Gold, A. (2018). Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41, 127-141.
Out, U.A., Elias, E.I. (2017). Auditor scepticism and financial crises: The Nigerian factor. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(4), 123-130.
Paal, T., Bereczkei, T. (2007). Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 541–551.
Pilch, I. (2008). Machiavellianism, emotional intelligence, and social competence: Are Machiavellians interpersonally skilled? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 39, 158–164.
Ramanaiah, N.V., Byravan, A., Detwiler, F. (1994). Revised NEO personality inventory of Machiavellian and non-Machiavellian people. Psychological Reports, 75, 937-938.
Raub, S. (2008). The impact of structure on organizational citizenship behavior in the hospitality industry, Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 179-186.
Shafer, W.E., Wang, Z. (2011). Effects of ethical context and Machiavellianism on attitudes toward earnings management in china. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(5), 372-392.
Szijjarto, L., Bereczkei, T. (2015). The Machiavellians’ cool syndrome: They experience intensive feelings but have difficulties in expressing their emotions. Current Psychology, 34, 363–375.
Wastell, C.A., Booth, A. (2003). Machiavellianism: An alexithymia perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 730-744.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken Schroder, G., Voppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.
Wilson, D.S., Near, D., Miller, R.R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 285–299.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 16 August 2019
  • Revise Date: 04 January 2020
  • Accept Date: 02 November 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics