Auditors' View on the Necessity and Status of Using Expert Services in Auditing

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate in Accounting, University of Alzahra, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Accounting, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2020.15570.3219

Abstract

Objective: The complicated and evolving features of the business environment, the extensive use of information technology, the continuous change of laws and regulations, and the use of fair values and assets' revaluation in the capital accumulation necessitate the use of expert auditing services. Also, the strong emphasis on the quality of auditing by the professionals and legislators shows that the current audit environment faces many challenges and auditors' response to them is to increase the participation of experts in auditing activities. Considering the adoption of international accounting standards in Iran and the emphasis of these standards on fair value, expert services, and revision of auditing standard 620 (using the services of auditors), this study aims to explore auditors’ attitude about the necessity of using expert services in auditing and examine the current status of the auditing profession using expert services.
 Method: Data collection method was survey method, and nonparametric statistical tests of Wilcoxon, Chi-squared, and Friedman were used to analyze the data.
 Results: According to the survey results, auditors emphasize the need to use specialized services in the current situation, but most auditing firms do not have any guidelines or instructions for specialized services in auditing other than auditing standards. Also, the valuation experts are the most widely used experts in auditing. Additionally, legal and tax experts are other important specialties that could be used after valuation. Among the eleven groups of experts in authorized legal expertise, the real estate appraisal group has the highest priority, followed by the finance, road, construction, and surveying groups. In the current situation, auditors are more likely to hire professionals who are paid by the client. But these auditors themselves do not play a decisive role in selecting experts. Also, from the auditors' point of view, the cost is one of the main factors influencing the absorption of specialized personnel. Also, the results showed that auditors mostly use experts who are outside the audit team and hired by the management. However, auditors' attitudes toward tax and IT experts are more convinced than those of other groups of experts.
 Conclusion: At present, valuation experts are most widely required in auditing than other specialties. Also, costs play the principal role in using specialized services in auditing. Accordingly, the auditors' team tends to employ specialists whose fees are paid by the management. But, the auditors' team is not significantly involved in designating management specialists. Therefore, the Association of Certified Public Accountants is advised to consider the cost of using expert services separately in the regulations for determining the fee of auditing services and to include the cost of expertise in calculating the fee for auditing services.

Keywords

References

سلیمانی امیری، غلامرضا؛ محمودخانی، مهناز. (1398). دیدگاه حسابرسان ایران در خصوص حسابرسی برآوردهای ارزش منصفانه. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 26(2)، 278-255.
کرزبر، شاهین. (1394). پیاده سازی استاندارهای بین‌المللی: انقلاب در اجرا. حسابدار، 285، 41-35.
گل‌محمدی، مریم؛ رحمانی، علی. (1397). شناسایی چالش‌های فنی به کارگیری ارزش منصفانه در گزارشگری مالی ایران: با تأکید بر الزامات IFRS 13، بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 25(3)، 414-387.
محمدرضائی، فخرالدین؛ فرجی، امید. (1398). معمای سنجش کیفیت حسابرسی در پژوهش‌های آرشیوی: نقد و ارائه پیشنهادهایی برای محیط پژوهشی ایران. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 26(1)، 122-87.
محمدیان، محمد. (1389). تحلیل بر بکارگیری ارزش منصفانه. دانش حسابرسی، 10(3)،57-78.
مظاهری، طهماسب. (1397). نشریه شورای عالی کارشناسان رسمی دادگستری. دوره جدید، 1، 25-15.
منصوری، فردین؛ سعیدی گراغانی، مسلم؛ اسدی دوبانی، ناهید. (1396). بررسی تأثیر تجدید ارزیابی دارایی‌ها بر حق‌الزحمه حسابرسی. دانش حسابداری، 8(4)، 159-141.
مولایی، جابر؛ مرادخانی، مهری. (1395). بررسی جامعه‌شناختی عوامل مؤثر بر هویت اجتماعی (مطالعه موردی دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور شهر آبدانان). علوم اجتماعی، 10(2)، 210-189.
References
Bauer, T.D., Estep, C., Malsch, B. (2018). One team or two? Investigating relationship quality between auditors and IT specialists: Implications for audit team identity and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2142-2177.
Boritz, J.E., Kochetova, N., Robinson, L.A., Wong, C. (2017). Auditors’ and specialists’ views about the use of specialists during an audit. www.ssrn.com
Christensen, B.E., Glover, S.M., Omer, T.C., Shelley, M.K. (2016). Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Review, 33(4), 81–114.
Deloitte, L.L.P. (2016). US audit quality report. New York, United States: Deloitte LLP.
Fitzgerald, Brian Colin (2014). Specialists or Colleagues: Who Do Auditors Listen To? Doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University. http://hdl .handle .net /1969.1/ 153317.
Golmohammadi, M., Rahmani, A. (2018). Technical challenges of implementing fair values in financial reporting of Iran: emphasizing on IFRS13 requirements. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Review, 25(3), 387-414 [In Persian].
Griffith, E.E. (2014). How do auditors use valuation specialists when auditing fair values? Working Paper, University of Wisconsin.
Griffith, E.E., Hammersley, J.S., Kadous, K., Young, D. (2015). Auditor mindsets and audits of complex estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(1), 49-77
Hux, C.T. (2017). Use of specialists on audit engagements: A research synthesis and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 39, 23-51
Jenkins, J.G., Negangard, E.M., Oler, M.J. (2018). Getting comfortable on audits: Understanding firms’ usage of forensic specialists. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(4), 1766-1797.
Joe, J.R., Janvrin, D.J., Barr-Pulliam, D., Mason, S., Pitman, M.K., Rezaee, Z., Sanderson, K., Wu, Y. (2015). The auditing standards committee of the auditing section of the american accounting association is pleased to provide comments on PCAOB staff consultation paper No. 2015-01, The auditor's use of the work of specialists. Current Issues in Auditing, 9(2), C18–C37.
Korzber, S. (2015). Implementing International Standards: A revolution in practice. The Accounting Monthly, 285, 41-35 [In Persian].
Mansouri, F., Saeidi Goraghani, M., Asadi Dobani, N. (2017). The effect of revaluation of assets on audit fees. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 8(4), 141-159 [In Persian].
Mazaheri, T (2018). Journal of the supreme council of official justice experts. New Course 1, 15-25 [In Persian].
Mohammadian, M. (2010). An analysis of the application of fair value. Auditing Knowledge, 10 (3), 57-78 [In Persian].
Mohammadrezaei, F., Faraji, O. (2019). The dilemma of audit quality measuring in archival studies: critiques and suggestions for Iran’s research setting. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Review, 26(1), 87-122 [In Persian].
Molaii, J., Moradkhani, M. (2016). The study of sociological effective factors on social trust (A case study: Students in Abdanan Payam-Noor University). Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (2), 210-189 [In Persian].
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (2017).Proposed amendments to auditing standards for auditor’s use of the work of specialists. Release No. 2015-003.Washington, DC: PCAOB [June 1].
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2015). Staff consultation paper No. The Auditor's Use of the Work of Specialists.
Soleimaniamiri, G., Mahmoudkhani, M. (2019). Iranian auditors perspectives about auditing of fair value estimates. Accounting and Auditing Review, 26(2), 255-278 [In Persian].

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 11 March 2020
  • Revise Date: 17 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 02 August 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics