Analysis of the Impact of Bankruptcy Risk Estimation on Auditor Conservatism

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Accounting, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Accounting, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Statistics, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.

10.22103/jak.2020.15009.3129

Abstract

Objective: Many accounting and auditing variables represent forecasts of future events. Accordingly, decision making under conditions of uncertainty is of fundamental importance in accounting and auditing studies. An important aspect of such studies is estimating the risk of corporate bankruptcy. The estimated risk occurs because the probability of the customer going bankrupt is unknown and must be determined statistically. The bankruptcy risk is somehow different from the estimated risk. Some companies can have the same point estimates of bankruptcy while they do not have the same risk estimates.
The level of risk estimation indicates the degree of inaccuracy in the point estimates of bankruptcy. We measure the risk estimate using the standard errors of point estimates of the bankruptcy because the risk estimate is the second-moment risk and measures the estimation precision and uncertainty around the point estimates of bankruptcy. In other words, we use the variance-covariance matrix to compute the standard errors of point estimates. In general, given the importance of bankruptcy and its consequences, our research aims to assess auditor's conservatism by measuring the risk estimates and analyzing their impacts on auditor behavior.
Methods: In this study, we first obtained the point estimates of bankruptcy and their standard errors, and then we predicted bankruptcy by specific models over rolling windows over the past five years. Then, we estimated multiple regression and probit models using the data set of 110 companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange, TSE, from 2007 to 2017. The data set was collected using financial statements, audit reports on the financial statements, the official website of the TSE, and the official data from the Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants. At last, we performed data analysis to test related research hypotheses.
Results: According to the research findings, an increase in the estimated risk of bankruptcy leads to a positive effect on the issuance of going opinion and no effect on audit fees.
Conclusion: The main idea of this study is reporting auditors are risk-averse. The estimated risk imposes incremental uncertainty on the risk-averse auditors and consequently, affects their behaviors. On the other hand, our findings suggest that auditors are more conservative when they face a greater risk. Auditors are cautious about their professional responsibility and social accountability related to the bankruptcy of their client firms. Auditors get more conservative along with the increase of the estimated risk.

Keywords

References

بذرافشان، سعید. (1397). بررسی اثر دورۀ جستجو برای حسابرس جایگزین بر حق الزحمه حسابرسی نخستین. دانش حسابداری، 9(1)، 194-171.
بهارمقدم، مهدی؛ صالحی، تابنده؛ اعظمی، زینب. (1396). رابطه بین توانایی مدیریت، حق الزحمه حسابرسی و تداوم فعالیت در شرکتهای پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی، 9(32)، 44-23.
خدادادی، ولی؛ ویسی، سجاد؛ چراغی نیا، علی. (1395). عدم قطعیت مدیریت و حق الزحمه حسابرسی. دانش حسابداری، 7(27)، 133-109.
درخشی، رضا؛ بادآور نهندی، یونس و برادران حسن زاده، رسول. (1394). تأثیر ساختار مالکیت و ساختار مالی بر حق‌الزحمه حسابرسی. دانش حسابرسی، 15(60)، 113-93.
رجبی، روح الله؛ محمدی خشویی، حمزه .(1387). هزینه‌های نمایندگی و قیمت‌گذاری خدمات حسابرسی مستقل. بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 15(53)، 52-35.
سلیمانی امیری، غلام‌رضا. (1382). نسبت‌های مالی و پیش بینی بحران مالی شرکت‌ها در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. تحقیقات مالی، 5(15)، 136-121.
علوی طبری، حسین و رجبی، روح الله؛ شهبازی، منصوره. (1390). رابطه نظام راهبری و حق‌الزحمه حسابرسی مستقل شرکت‌ها. دانش حسابداری، 2(5)، 101-75.
کردستانی، غلامرضا؛ تاتلی، رشید. (1393). ارزیابی توان پیش بینی مدل‌های ورشکستگی (مقایسه مدل‌های اولیه و تعدیل شده). دانش حسابرسی، 14(55)، 70-51.
کمیته تدوین استانداردهای حسابرسی. (1396). استانداردهای حسابرسی. چاپ پانزدهم. تهران، انتشارات سازمان حسابرسی.
والاس، واندا ای. (1381). نقش اقتصادی حسابرسی در بازارهای آزاد و بازارهای تحت نظارت، ترجمه حامی امیراصلانی، تهران، انتشارات سازمان حسابرسی.
References
Alavi Tabari, H., Rajabi, R., Shahbazi, M. (2011).The relationship between corporate governance and audit fees. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 2(5), 75-101 [In Persian].
Altman, E. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609
Altman, E. (1982). Accounting implications of failure prediction models. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 6(1), 4-19.
Barron, O., Pratt, J., Stice, J.D. (2001). Misstatement direction, litigation risk, and planned audit investment. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 449-462.
Basu, S., Hwang, L.S., Jan, C.L. (2002). Auditor conservatism and quarterly earnings. Available at SSRN 2428862.
Bahar Moghaddam, M., Salehi, T., Azami, Z. (2017). The relationship between management ability, audit fee, and going concern among firms listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 9(32), 23-44 [In Persian].
Bazrafshan, S. (2018). Effects of search period for successor auditor on initial audit fees and type of successor auditor. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 9(1), 171-194 [In Persian].
Basu, S. )2009(. Conservatism research: Historical development and future prospects. Chinese Journal of Accounting Research, 2(1), 1–20.
Beaver, W.H., Correira, M., McNichols, M. (2012). Do differences in financial reporting attributes impair the predictive ability of financial ratios for bankruptcy? Review of Accounting Studies, 17(4), 969–1010.
Bharat, S.T., Shumway, T. (2008). Forecasting default with the Merton distance to default model. Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1339-1369.
Blay, A.D., Geiger, M.A., North, D.S. (2011). The auditor's going-concern opinion as a communication of risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 77-102.
Campbell, J.Y., Hilscher, J., Szilagyi, J. (2008). In search of financial distress. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2899–2939.
Campbell, J.E., Mutchler, J.F. (1988). The expectations gap and going concern uncertainties. Accounting Horizons, 2(1), 42-49.
Carcello, J.V., Palmrose, Z.V. (1994). Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients.Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 1-30
Carson, E., Fargher, N.L., Geiger, M.A., Lennox, C.S., Raghunandan, K., Willekens, M. (2012). Audit reporting for going-concern uncertainty: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(sp1), 353-384.
Chen, K.C.W., Church, B.K. (1996). Going concern options and the market’s reaction to bankruptcy filings. The Accounting Review, 71(1), 117-128.
Correia, M., Richardson, S., Tuna, I. (2012). Value investing in credit markets. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(3), 572–609.
DeFond, M.L., Raghunandan, K., Subramanyam, K.R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going-concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–1274.
DeFond, M.L., Lim, C.Y., Zang, Y. (2015). Client conservatism and auditor-client contracting. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 69-98.
Derakhshi, R., Badavar Nahandi, Y., Baradaran Hasanzade, R. (2015). Ownership structure and financial structure on audit fees. Journal of Auditing Knowledge, 15(60), 93-113 [In Persian].
Dhaliwal, D., Huang, S.X., Khurana, I.K., Pereira, R. (2011). Product Market Competition and Conditional Accounting Conservatism. Working Paper, University of Arizona, University of Arkansas and University of Missouri at Columbia.
Firth, M. (1990). Auditor reputation: The impact of critical reports issued by government inspectors. Journal of Economics, 21(3), 374-388
Francis, J.R., Yu, M.D. (2009). Big four office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552.
Greene, W.H. (2011). Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. Prentice Hall.
Gutierrez, E., Minutti-Meza, M., Vulcheva, M. (2016). How useful are auditors’ going concern opinions as predictors of default? Retrieved from http://www.warrington. ufl. edu/ accounting/docs/2016_Paper7.
Hopwood, W., McKeown, J., Mutchler, J. (1989). A test of the incremental explanatory power of options qualified for consistency and uncertainty. The Accounting Review, 64(1), 28-48.
Hopwood, W., McKeown, J., Mutchler. J. (1994). The reexamination of auditor versus model accuracy within the context of the going concern option decision. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(2), 409-432.
Hribar, P., Kravet, T., Wilson, R. (2014). A new measure of accounting quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 506–538.
Huang, Y., Scholz, S. (2012). Evidence on the association between financial restatements and auditor resignations. Accounting Horizons, 26(3), 439–464.
Hausman, J.A., McFadden, D.L. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica, 52, 1219-1240.
Iranian Auditing Standards Committee. (1396). Auditing Standards. 15th edition. Tehran, Audit Organization Publications [In Persian].
Kapln, S.E., Williams D.D. (2013). Do going concern audit reports protect auditors from litigation? A simultaneous equations approach. The Accounting Review, 88(1), 192-232.
Kausar, A., Taffler, R.J., Tan, C. (2009). The going‐concern market anomaly. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1), 213-239.
Khodadadi, V., Veisi, S., Cheraghinia, A. (2017). Management uncertainty and audit fees. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 7(27), 109-133 [In Persian].
Kordestani, Gh., Tatli, R. (2014).The Evaluation of prediction ability of bankruptcy models: primary versus adjusted models. Journal of Auditing Knowledge, 14 (55), 51-70 [In Persian].
Larcker, D.F., Richardson, S.A. (2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 625–658.
Lee, Y., Okui, R. (2012). Hahn–Hausman test as a specification test. Journal of Econometrics, 167(1), 133-139.
Lennox, C.S., Kausar A. (2017). Estimation risk and auditor conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(1), 185-216.
Lys, T., Watts, R.L. (1994). Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 65-93
Menon, K., Williams, D.D. (2010). Investor reaction to going concern audit reports. The Accounting Review, 85(6), 2075-2105.
Ohlson, J.A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131.
Palmrose, Z.V. (1987). Litigation and independent auditors: the role of business failures and management fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 6(2), 90-103.
Rajabi, R., Mohammadi Khoshoei, H. (2009). Agency costs & independent audit services pricing. Accounting and Auditing Review, 15(53), 35-52. [In Persian].
Shirata, C.Y. (1998). Financial ratios as predictors of bankruptcy in Japan: An empirical research. Proceedings of the Second Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, (pp. 437-445). Tsukuba College of Technology.
Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: A simple hazard model. Journal of Business, 74(1), 101-124.
Soleymani Amiri, Gh. (2003). Financial ratios and forecasting of companies' financial crisis: Evidence from firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Research Journal, 5(15), 121-136 [In Persian].
Venkataraman, R., Weber, J.P., Willenborg, M. (2008). Litigation risk, audit quality and audit fees: Evidence from initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 83(5), 1315–1345.
Weil, J. (2001). Going concerns: Did accountants fail to flag problems at dot-com casualties? The Wall Street Journal, 9, C1.
Wallace, W.A. (2002). Economic role of the audit in free and regulated markets: auditing monographs. Translated by Hami Amiraslani, Tehran, Audit Organization Publications [In Persian].
Willenborg, M., McKeown, J. (2001). Going concern initial public offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 279-313.
Zmijewski, M. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial stress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 59-82.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 November 2019
  • Revise Date: 22 January 2020
  • Accept Date: 19 May 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics