Fuzzy Approaches Ability and their Performance Comparison to Fraud Detection in Financial Reporting

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Sabezevar Branch, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Student of Accounting, Hajiabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hajiabad, Iran.

Abstract

The possibility of fraud in the issued financial statements, and its negative impacts on financial markets and the resulting reduction of investment have caused responsible monitoring organizations to detect the frauds and to move seriously against them. This study aimed to investigate the ability of the fuzzy approaches to fraud detection in financial reporting of the firms in the Tehran Stock Exchange. In this study, three hypotheses were considered. First, the Fuzzy decision tree classifier can detect fraud in financial reporting. Secondly, the Sugeno fuzzy classifier can detect fraud in financial reporting. Thirdly, there is a significant difference between the results of fuzzy decision tree classifier and Sugeno fuzzy classifier. These fuzzy approaches were programmed and used for testing the above hypotheses, using Matlab Software. The average accuracy of the Fuzzy decision tree classifier was 31/312, and of the Sugeno fuzzy classifier was 80/92. In other words, the first hypothesis was rejected and the second and third hypotheses were verified.

Keywords


Accounting Standards Setting Committee. (2008). Accounting and Auditing Principles and Regulations: Accounting Standards. Audit Organization [In Persian].
Asnaashari, H., Ahmad khan beige, M. (2010). The role of strategic reasoning in the detection prevention of fraud. Journal of Auditor, 4(47), 74-81 [In Persian].
Bulu, G., Sadeghi, P. (2011). The effect of individual moral characteristics of auditors on the use of fraud detection management decision guide. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 5(4), 74-83 [In Persian].
Etemadi, H., Zalaghi, H. (2013). Logistic regression usage to identify fraudulent financial reporting. Audit Knowledge, 13(51), 145-162 [In Persian].
Farajzadeh Dehkordi, H., Aghai, L. (2015). Profit sharing policy and fraudulent financial reporting. Empirical Studies of Financial Accounting, 12(45), 97-114 [In Persian].
Hassas yeganeh, Y., Osku, V., Daghani, R. (2012). Fraud in the company: Who warn. The CPA Journal, 2(3), 35-40 [In Persian].
Maham, K., Kordestani, G., Torabi, A. (2013). Model to predict the risk of financial fraud in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. First national Conference on Accounting and Management, Islamic Azad University Noor [In Persian].
Naderian, M.R., Saffar, M.J. (2002). Auditor's responsibility for fraud. Journal of Auditor, 2(13), 46-54 [In Persian].
Pooria nasab, A. (2006). Comprehensive structure to help analyze, detect and prevent fraud. The CPA Journal, 3(7), 27-36 [In Persian].
Salimi, A. (1996). How can auditors detect misstatements in the financial statements? Journal of Accountant, 12(124), 74-79 [In Persian].
Safarzadeh, M.H. (2011). The ability of financial ratios fraud in financial reporting: Logit analysis. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 1(1), 137-163 [In Persian].
Sajjadi, H., Kazemi, T. (2016). A comprehensive pattern of fraudulent financial reporting based on the theory of foundation ground in Iran. Empirical Studies of Accounting. 6(21), 185-204 [In Persian].
Vahidi Eliziee, E., Hamedian, H. (2010). Auditors removal of the warning signs of efficacy in the detection of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 162-197 [In Persian].
Vakili Fard, H.R., Jabbarzadeh Kangar Luei, S., Poor Reza Sultan Ahmadi, A. (2010). Characteristics of fraud in the financial statements. Journal of Accountant, 24(210), 36-41 [In Persian].
Zare Behnamiri, M.J., Malekian Kalehbasti, E. (2015). Fraud prediction of financial statement using financial ratios (Case study: Accepted firms in Tehran Stock Exchange). Financial Outlook. 12, 65-80 [In Persian].